You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Lake Philpott & Dam OD2_8560_8630 has 513 days difference between storage methods
This is to investigate why within WaterAvailability_CaseStudies.Rmd
Could one of these end years cause a >365 day difference?
Answer: we trim for a warmup period, so this is unlikely to cause a problem unless something is in the last 3months of the run
l90 <- loflows["90 Day Min"];
ndx <- which.min(as.numeric(l90[,"90 Day Min"]));
l90_Qout <- round(loflows[ndx,]$`90 Day Min`,6);
l90_year <- loflows[ndx,]$`year`;
l90yr_start <- as.POSIXct(paste0(l90_year,"-01-01")) #start of l90 year
l90yr_end <- as.POSIXct(paste0(l90_year,"-12-31")) #end of l90 year
datpd_90yr <- window( #data for the l90 year
dat,
start = l90yr_start,
end = l90yr_end
)
Other potential causes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Lake Philpott & Dam OD2_8560_8630 has 513 days difference between storage methods
This is to investigate why within WaterAvailability_CaseStudies.Rmd
Could one of these end years cause a >365 day difference?
Answer: we trim for a warmup period, so this is unlikely to cause a problem unless something is in the last 3months of the run
We do calculate using calendar year:
Other potential causes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: