Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Combine BarotropicQG and BarotropicQGQL #8

Open
glwagner opened this issue Oct 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Combine BarotropicQG and BarotropicQGQL #8

glwagner opened this issue Oct 15, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@glwagner
Copy link
Member

glwagner commented Oct 15, 2018

Continuing the discussion from FourierFlows issue #72.

At first glance, these problems have a lot in common.

In fact, I think it may ultimately make sense to include 2D turbulence in BarotropicQG, at least for the purposes of the GeophysicalFlows package. In GeophysicalFlow, 2D turbulence certainly is a type of barotropic QG flow.

Let's discuss the specific pros and cons. I'm not sure what is meant by the inclusion being 'cumbersome', but I do see some pros in avoiding the duplication of functions that calculate things like energy and enstrophy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant