dealiasing should be part of the equation, not the grid

[navidcy]

It makes more sense.

Yes, dealiasing is related to wavenumbers. But whether dealiasing should happened and what sort of dealiasing (2/3, 1/2, ...) depends on the order of nonlinearity that calcN! includes. So it makes more sense to make kralias, kalias, ... part of the Equation struct.

[glwagner]

I think this could work.

But I'd point out that dealiasing is really not a property of a PDE, but a property of arithmetic operations between fields. With a fully-fledged field abstraction, I think dealiasing would have to be part of the grid.

[navidcy]

Hm... OK. Dealiasing should be part of the grid. But for different equations the aliasing_factor could be different...

[navidcy]

We'll leave this for future, not something to be done in #285.

[glwagner]

I guess equations / problems might have to enforce certain grid properties?

[navidcy]

Yes, ideally either the equation or the problem might be able to change the aliased_fraction property of the grid...