-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestion suggestion: Motor subsystem implementations with supervised mode #66
Comments
Sounds interesting. Do you have any examples from the past few years where it could have being useful? |
It's useful for both automated and manual control schemes. These things are anyway used in manual mode (controlling an arm or driving) and in automated mode we also need to supervise it somehow. Specifically in 2017 we had arm that wasn't limited mechanically enough so it was also limited by code. It's useful to use both anyways |
Okay sure go ahead |
Ok, but should I just do supervised moveables, and systems? and drives? or did you have something else in mind/. |
I don't really have any ideas. But maybe something will come up after you open something. |
passive aggressive? ok I'll do something |
oops |
Add some subsystems or interfaces (or options for existing things e.g. rotateable) that will allow built in guaranteed supervised behavior. e.g. don't cross certain angle or speed. (could just receive a supplier)
I can implement it if you think that it's a good idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: