Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why you call this model ddpm in your paper? #10

Open
wyhlovecpp opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Why you call this model ddpm in your paper? #10

wyhlovecpp opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@wyhlovecpp
Copy link

Hi,
I can see from your code and the introduction of your paper that your method adds noise at a fixed time t during training and then directly predicts the original image for l1 loss constraint. In the inference stage, the noise is added to a fixed time t and the final result is predicted in one step.

I think it is more like a unet debluring model than ddpm. Because ddpm is multi-step iterative to predict noise, and the earliest work in 2015 is multi-step iterative to predict the original image. You use a fixed number of step to add and remove noise, and predict the original image in one step. Is this really a diffusion model?

Thank you very much for your work! This is not to question the validity and authenticity of your work, but to ask why it belongs to the diffusion model.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant