Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Could you consider supporting mozjpeg? #115

Open
yeezylife opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Could you consider supporting mozjpeg? #115

yeezylife opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@yeezylife
Copy link

MozJPEG improves JPEG compression efficiency achieving higher visual quality and smaller file sizes at the same time. It is compatible with the JPEG standard, and the vast majority of the world's deployed JPEG decoders.

More information about mozjpeg can be found here:https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg

@Faster3ck
Copy link
Owner

Thank you very much for your suggestion. I will check if it's possible to integrate mozjpeg to ImageMagick as Converseen uses IM to manipulate images.

@NicholasFlamy
Copy link

Thank you very much for your suggestion. I will check if it's possible to integrate mozjpeg to ImageMagick as Converseen uses IM to manipulate images.

It should be easy because mozjpeg is simply a fork of libjpeg-turbo (which you already use) with a bunch of tweaks and tuning but without changing the name or the way it works. It's an exact drop-in replacement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants