Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Could you maybe provide an example. I'm not yet sure how you mean it. But generally I'm open to change the format if it reduces one step. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
I am planning to produce a POC, so let's not do any duplicate work, @marcenko ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Currently, fetching features is a three step process:
GET /features/
to get a list of modality namesGET /features/{modaliy_name}
to get a list of features in the specified modalityGET / features/{modality_name}/{feature_id}
to get the detail on a specific feature.Proposal is:
GET /features/
to get a list of features (with ways to distinguish the type, either with atype
field or etc)GET /features/{feature_id}
to get details on the featurecc/ @marcenko
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions