-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Documentation for validation of measurer #7
Comments
I have added a table (Table 2) that needs to be filled. -Bachir. |
is this issue still relevant or adressed by the table that Bachir created in D3.3? |
@jetschny shouldn't we add the UC partners to the assignees? Not sure which UC are currently using this functionality |
Hi @cozzolinoac11, I am opening the following issue, because I came across a minor problem. Thanks in advance, Best regards, -Bachir. |
Hi @BachirNILU, What do you think about this? cheers |
Sure! Thanks @cozzolinoac11! We just should probably make sure that no common "utilities" library exists (by running pip install utilities?). |
Hi @BachirNILU
so I assume there is no common library. If we want to be even safer, we can rename the file to 'measurer_utilities'. What do you think about this? cheers |
Looks like it yes! |
I just renamed the "utils" file to "measurer_utilities". cheers |
for the validation of the automatic resource monitoring we need to have more detailed information on what each value in the csv means and how it is derived. if it uses a third party libary, it would be good to know how this libary is coming up with the value as well. for more detailed information we can also reference publications, internet sources but we generally need to know how values have been derived and what they relate to.
if we noticed e.g. a large deviation in memory consumption it could be due different ways of measuring it
bachir has requested this info for D3.3 already, but we should also have it in the repo and the KB.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: