You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the previous version of D4.2 submitted early this year, the mapping to STAC concepts in the mapping table was correct, where fields where available from the STAC Spec including extensions, these were provided. Where no STAC concept was available, there was a "fic" placeholder. In addition, we had the agreement that the missing concepts would be proposed to the relevant STAC extensions.
In the latest update, not only have the "fic" placeholders been removed, other concepts that had been mapped to existing extensions are now freestyle (e.g., contact information, was mapped to the contacts extension, now under an undefined "providers" namespace)
Please revert these back to valid STAC concepts
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the previous version of D4.2 submitted early this year, the mapping to STAC concepts in the mapping table was correct, where fields where available from the STAC Spec including extensions, these were provided. Where no STAC concept was available, there was a "fic" placeholder. In addition, we had the agreement that the missing concepts would be proposed to the relevant STAC extensions.
In the latest update, not only have the "fic" placeholders been removed, other concepts that had been mapped to existing extensions are now freestyle (e.g., contact information, was mapped to the contacts extension, now under an undefined "providers" namespace)
Please revert these back to valid STAC concepts
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: