Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

B2SHARE Handle prefix #155

Closed
stranak opened this issue Feb 18, 2014 · 6 comments
Closed

B2SHARE Handle prefix #155

stranak opened this issue Feb 18, 2014 · 6 comments

Comments

@stranak
Copy link

stranak commented Feb 18, 2014

We must have our own Handle prefix.

@stranak stranak added this to the 0.5 – Spring release milestone Feb 18, 2014
@stranak
Copy link
Author

stranak commented Mar 3, 2014

the prefix will be 11304

@Kallio
Copy link
Contributor

Kallio commented Mar 7, 2014

prefix is installed on production server.

@stranak
Copy link
Author

stranak commented Mar 9, 2014

On 07 Mar 2014, at 13:51, Kallio [email protected] wrote:

prefix is installed on production server.

OK, thanks. I assume you have tested it before. This was an upgrade with potential to break the whole service.

Do you have a plan on how to assign the new PIDs also to existing records? Do we just assign them, display them in GUI, and keep the old PIDs as they are, just don’t display them any more?

Greetings from Athens,

Pavel
PS: I will be available very little, if at all for the next three days.

@llehtine
Copy link

Hi,

I've checked in test-enviroment and the old pids still work correctly, even when the configuration is changed. Old PIDs are still showing on the page, and those links are working, and all the new records are assigned new PIDS. So unless there is some other need to change the old PIDs to new ones, I would vote to let the old PIDs stay as they are and continue assigning new PIDs to new deposits.

@stranak
Copy link
Author

stranak commented Mar 11, 2014

The old PIDs should stay, but we should also assign new PIDs to those old records. New PIDs will then be shown on the web pages. It is good for consistency: all our records will have our PIDs. Some may also have other PIDs, but we will not need to rely on that service, keep checking it is running, etc.

@stranak stranak added and removed labels Mar 31, 2014
@Kallio
Copy link
Contributor

Kallio commented Apr 1, 2014

Assigned new PIDs to old records. only new PID is visible when showin the record but old PID will still point to the file.

@Kallio Kallio closed this as completed Apr 1, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants