Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Documentation review #36

Open
alvarolopez opened this issue Nov 22, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Documentation review #36

alvarolopez opened this issue Nov 22, 2016 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement
Projects
Code cleaning and hardening
Milestone
1.0

Comments

@alvarolopez
Copy link
Contributor

The current README is hard to follow, we should make it more crisp, and add some proper documentation in separate files.
@alvarolopez alvarolopez added this to the 1.0 milestone Nov 22, 2016
@gwarf
Copy link
Member

gwarf commented Apr 6, 2018 •
edited by brucellino
Loading

According to recommended community standards it's also required to add (or extract) this missing information:

  • code of conduct
  • Contributing
  • License
  • Issue or pull request template

@brucellino
Copy link
Member

Most of the above are done in #77. I will take a look at the documentation, with virgin eyes.

@brucellino
Copy link
Member

brucellino commented May 1, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Added the license (apache 2.0, owned by @EGI-Foundation)

@gwarf gwarf added this to To do in Code cleaning and hardening via automation May 29, 2018
@gwarf
Copy link
Member

gwarf commented Jun 19, 2018 •
edited by enolfc
Loading

  • The License should not be onwed by @EGI-Foundation but by some like "the Authors".
  • Every provider should be docuented individually and completely

@enolfc enolfc mentioned this issue Jan 9, 2019
Merged
@enolfc enolfc mentioned this issue Dec 16, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
Code cleaning and hardening
  
To do
Milestone
1.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@gwarf @alvarolopez @brucellino