-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rockchip RK35xx detection flaws #209
Comments
Thanks for the information! Indeed, it seems like they changed the order at some point. I've pushed a commit that should fix it, can you confirm if it works in your machines? |
RK3588 gets now 'detected' as that:
My own try to distinguish between RK3588 and RK3588S is here: Few NVMEM samples collected (in brackets the SoC revision according to
But same situation as before with RK3568 (since a typo slipped in):
After manually fixing the typo it works as expected:
|
Thanks again for your feedback, I've fixed the typo. Regarding RK3588/S, checking dmesg is not something that I will do for now, maybe in the future we find more straightforward ways. For now I'm closing this issue, but I'll keep an eye on future updates on this 👍 |
Sorry for the misunderstanding. 'My' differentiation is solely based on |
Hi there,
starting from at least RK35xx Rockchip seems to have reverted the relevant SoC bits (confirmed with at least RK3528, RK3566, RK3568 and RK3588/RK3588s):
RK3568 in NanoPi R5S:
And the RK3588 in my Rock-5B is wrongly reported as RK3588s:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: