You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
1.- Successful transactions with internal revertions are possible when the instruction reverted is a low level staticcall transaction.
2.- Both of the former transactions failed at the same stage, with the exact same staticcall transactions.
3.- In one of the reverted internal transactions, the PriceFeed contract (0x437aC62769f386B2D238409b7f0a7596d36506e4) calls the SovrynProtocol contract (0x5a0D867E0D70FCc6ADe25c3f1B89d618b5B4EaA7) with the view function decimals() which does not belong to that contract, but to a standard ERC20 contract. Thatr's the reason for this kind of revertion.
4.- However about which instruction is ordering the query of "decimals" to a non ERC20 contract, is still unknown.
5.- The former internal transaction is related to an internal call to the queryReturn function of PriceFeed which calls the internal function _queryRate(address sourceToken, address destToken) but this call use as destToken the address of SovrynProtocol (non ERC20 contract) causing a revertion. What instruction is ordering PriceFeeds to do that call with such wrong parameter is still unknown.
Tx: 0x8bf5a2b77701981d75e57225aa00c99e76ba3cc39d9862b0ae5702ad122d327d
Tx: 0xcc90582268236201bf322fed034aa9a23a4b34c15bb25f9bf42ebb4b713350b5
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: