-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Description
We have found that for a specific projection (there may be others) that Distance doesn't seem to be correctly interpreting the projection information. The study area is imported and displays fine but when asked to create a coverage grid the coordinates of the coverage grid do not fall within the study region (this can be checked by creating a map and adding the study area and then the coverage grid - you should see the coverage grid points across the study area). This problem persists whether the shape import wizard is used or whether they are manually imported by copying them into the .dat folder.
We often recommend that projection information not be included in Distance projects once the shape file has been projected into m, km etc. So a simple fix is just to separate the .prj file from the shape file prior to import. You need only then tell Distance which units are correct for your study region. You can then reattach the .prj file to the study region later and any surveys created in Distance to back transform into lat and lon in your GIS software.
Note that dssd our design package in R did not display the same issues with the problematic projection as seen in Distance so this is another alternative.
It is unlikely that we will be able to resolve this issue from within Distance.