You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 19, 2022. It is now read-only.
The inflection point for each point in the chart displaying satisfaction + interest + usage + awareness is rising in the actual data value, but the line graph shows it as a decline, so it may be perceived as if it fell.
In the image below, some items, including cypress and storybook, are charts that have risen slightly as the year changes, but decline on the line graph.
Fortunately, a percentage is displayed for each point, so you can check.
Nevertheless, I think that the graph alone should be modified so that it can be recognized more clearly.
If the value of the pointers of the starting point on the left is similar to the right and not as a continuous point (if the difference between the upper and lower values is large), it will be resolved
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's ranking so an item can see an increase in value but still fall overall in the rankings. I'm not sure how to solve that? Are you suggesting we should just remove the lines between each point?
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The inflection point for each point in the chart displaying satisfaction + interest + usage + awareness is rising in the actual data value, but the line graph shows it as a decline, so it may be perceived as if it fell.
In the image below, some items, including cypress and storybook, are charts that have risen slightly as the year changes, but decline on the line graph.
Fortunately, a percentage is displayed for each point, so you can check.
Nevertheless, I think that the graph alone should be modified so that it can be recognized more clearly.
If the value of the pointers of the starting point on the left is similar to the right and not as a continuous point (if the difference between the upper and lower values is large), it will be resolved
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: