Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LWC support #321

Open
Spyrion opened this issue Jun 5, 2020 · 7 comments
Open

LWC support #321

Spyrion opened this issue Jun 5, 2020 · 7 comments
Labels
Possible Might be added - good candidate for a PR!

Comments

@Spyrion
Copy link

Spyrion commented Jun 5, 2020

It would be nice to implement a tag that identifies if a user owns and/or has permissions on a protected item.

Link to LWC Github:

@mcmonkey4eva mcmonkey4eva added the Possible Might be added - good candidate for a PR! label Jun 5, 2020
@VieuxMulot
Copy link

Another ideas related to LWC being supported by Denizen:
<PlayerTag.list_lwc_locks>
<MaterialTag.is_lwc_locked>
<LocationTag.is_lwc_locked>
<MaterialTag.lwc_locked[owner]>
<LocationTag.lwc_locked[owner]>

@pobab

This comment has been minimized.

1 similar comment
@MrMaleficus

This comment has been minimized.

@tal5
Copy link
Member

tal5 commented Aug 18, 2021

LWC support would be great, perhaps a location and material tag mechanism for locking and unlocking, a tag to check for the owner of the lock, a tag to check for players trusted/added to the lock, and a tag to check for lock types

@SXRWahrheit
Copy link
Contributor

Which LWC? There are like five different forks.

@Spyrion
Copy link
Author

Spyrion commented Aug 18, 2021

If I'm correct is this one: https://github.com/pop4959/LWCX/wiki/Developers#using-lwc-as-a-dependency

It is on the first comment :)

@tal5
Copy link
Member

tal5 commented Aug 29, 2021

And maybe an option to add/check/remove LWC flags on locks, and an option for lock types in the locking command / mechanism

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Possible Might be added - good candidate for a PR!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants