Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add multi-animal support to DLCLive #72

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

jeylau
Copy link
Contributor

@jeylau jeylau commented Jun 9, 2022

  • Check DLCRNet model freezing
  • Add dependency on DLC??

MultiAnimalDLCLive can be instantiated e.g. as:

from dlclive.dlclive import MultiAnimalDLCLive

live = MultiAnimalDLCLive(
    'path_to_snapshot',
    n_animals=3,
    n_multibodyparts=12,
    track_method="box",
    sim_threshold=0.3,
)
live.init_inference(allow_growth=True)
animals, unique = live.get_pose(frame)

Fixes #57

@jeylau jeylau added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 9, 2022
@jeylau jeylau marked this pull request as draft June 9, 2022 19:12
@jeylau jeylau changed the title Add multi-animal support to DLCLive WIP: Add multi-animal support to DLCLive Jun 9, 2022
@jeylau jeylau changed the title WIP: Add multi-animal support to DLCLive Add multi-animal support to DLCLive Jun 10, 2022
@jeylau jeylau marked this pull request as ready for review June 10, 2022 07:18
Copy link
Collaborator

@sneakers-the-rat sneakers-the-rat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor revisions, mostly to do with keeping API consistent between DLCLive and MultiAnimalDLCLive. To me it would be nice to have these in a flat hierarchy: root DLCLive object, then subclasses that implement the different variations of inference -- as is it's getting a bit messy with the root object having a bunch of if switches that are sort of mutually incompatible with the subclass. Seems like a headache to maintain, but I ain't doing it so i'm not going to sit here and demand you to do it for me ;)

The stuff that I think should be changed are

  • the things that match the signatures between the two classes,
  • matching behavior for cropping and dynamic_cropping (by splitting them out to a separate method in the parent class rather than duplicating the code in the child class)
  • adding documentation (in __init__ and any changes to get_pose (like if pose is a different shape or something)

the rest are 'would be nice' and might be helpful for maintenance/readability.

pcutoff: float = 0.5,
display_radius: int = 3,
display_cmap: str = "bmy",
):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

needs docstring! Since inherits from DLCLive but the signature differs, need to also document changes in calling convention. Also need to document any new attrs

class MultiAnimalDLCLive(DLCLive):
def __init__(
self,
model_path,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

type hint!
model_path: Union[Path, str]
n_animals: int
n_multibodyparts: int

def __init__(
self,
model_path,
n_animals,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are these not specified in the config file?

model_path,
n_animals,
n_multibodyparts,
track_method: str = "box",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this could be a literal
track_method: Literal['box', 'ellipse']

display: typing.Union[bool, Display] = False,
pcutoff: float = 0.5,
display_radius: int = 3,
display_cmap: str = "bmy",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missing arguments from parent signature:

  • model_type
  • precision
  • tf_config
  • cropping
  • dynamic

Any reason? We should try and make uniform API if possible.

Since these are all in the DLCLive.PARAMETERS tuple, this will cause .parameterization to error. This also removes control over the process_frame method.

Two approaches: add the missing arguments, or else remove all of them and accept a **kwargs that gets passed to the parent class.

self.display.display_frame(frame, self.pose)

if self.resize is not None:
self.pose[0][..., :2] *= 1 / self.resize
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems like this should happen for n poses, right? rather than a hard 2? but i'm not sure what the structure of pose is here.

self.pose[1][:, :2] *= 1 / self.resize

if self.processor:
self.pose = self.processor.process(self.pose, **kwargs)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does the processor need to be different for maDLC pose?

if self.processor:
self.pose = self.processor.process(self.pose, **kwargs)

return self.pose
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does the close method need to be updated at all? again not sure how the maDLC stuff works.

raise DLCLiveError("No frame provided for live pose estimation")

frame = self.process_frame(frame)
data_dict = predict_multianimal.predict_batched_peaks_and_costs(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure what happens from here to L627, some comments would be nice!


return pose

def get_pose(self, frame=None, **kwargs):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

now might also be a good time to add docstrings to these methods too -- their function is straightforward enough, but documenting what goes on in them, etc. either here or documenting the arguments/attrs in the __init__ docstring that change the function here.

@sneakers-the-rat
Copy link
Collaborator

Hell ya. thanks for handling this. I can't push to your fork, so I made a few initial hopefully uncontroversial amendments in madlc branch. We can either use that as the PR source or else you can just merge that into yours.

  • Tests fail because scipy and deeplabcut are now imported but not added to package requirements in pyproject.toml, added (deeplabcut^2.2.0 and scipy^1.8.0 for python>=3.8 and >=1.7.0,<1.8.0 for python>=3.7.1,<3.8)
  • Version not incremented per semver, incremented to 1.1.0 because of addition of new backwards-compatible feature
  • Added CHANGELOG.md to describe changes to library since we don't have docs to speak of. Would you mind filling that out/adding some usage notes to the README?
  • Added CONTRIBUTING.md to formalize the update process a tiny tiny bit: just stuff like increment version, write docs, tests, etc.
  • Can we get a test for this? it can be as barebones as the existing one (just checking that it runs, rather than confirming the values of the run) imo. This will save us headaches down the line and prevent accidental regressions in any future changes. The test action just runs dlc-live-test (dlclive.check_install.check_install.main), so you could add it as an additional function there called within main(). Like the existing test, that would require
    • Downloading a pretrained model & project
    • downloading a test video
    • running inference on the test video

@thomasilmer
Copy link

thomasilmer commented Jul 15, 2022

@jeylau Are you still working on this? Otherwise I could attempt to make the requested changes.

@jeylau jeylau marked this pull request as draft August 29, 2022 09:14
@jeylau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jeylau commented Nov 10, 2022

Hey @thomasilmer, I'll update this PR soon, but please feel free to contribute too; you'd be very welcome!

@MMathisLab
Copy link
Member

@jeylau let's finish this :)

@thomasilmer
Copy link

Hey @jeylau, I took a look at the requested changes and must admit that I quickly realized that I am not familiar enough with the internal workings of DeepLabCut to contribute anything meaningful at this moment.

My apologies.

@frankiechang123
Copy link

Hi @jeylau @MMathisLab !I'm currently trying to apply maDLC models on live videos. Just wondering what is the status of supporting maDLC models in DLCLive? I'm also willing to contribute to help the development!

@thomasilmer
Copy link

thomasilmer commented Aug 16, 2023

I have tried running this code locally and there were some changes I had to make to prevent exceptions from happening when indexes went out of bounds. What is the preferred method for contributing these changes @jeylau ?

Additionally, I noticed that track_method='ellipse' seems to give more consistent poses than track_method='box'. Is there any reason for this or is this heavily dependent on the type of data you process?

Finally, there is some strange behavior when analysing videos where animals enter the frame from one side and exit on the other side (have not tested on other footage). The animals are lost after some time and we need to run 'init_inference' again to get better results again.

@MMathisLab
Copy link
Member

Very happy to accept a PR - so please just edit in your forked copy and open a pull request to us and tag us for review, thanks!!

Cc @n-poulsen

@itisomar
Copy link

Hi guys @gkane26 @jeylau @MMathisLab @sneakers-the-rat , first things first, a huge thanks and shout out to the DLC team and the people who are contributing to this wonderful project in any way whatsoever.

As I implemented the MultiAnimalDLCLive class, I encountered several issues that are known to you guys and the great DLC community.

I'll list the issues which I have encountered below:

1 - init_inference() : When you call init_inference(allow_growth=True) before get_pose(frame), the pose estimation seems to work well. However, in the long run, the pose estimation drops drastically in frames. In some cases, it fails to detect any body parts. One workaround is to call init_inference(allow_growth=True) whenever that happens, which asks for a lot of memory, causing the frame rate to drop to zero.”
As some have mentioned in the following forum: https://forum.image.sc/t/live-inference-for-multi-animal-deeplabcut/73509.diff

2 - max_age : It needs to be set as high as ‘100’ for my project, in order for MultiAnimalDLCLive to be able to detect body parts. Otherwise, MultiAnimalDLCLive is unable to detect body parts and the detection rate drops drastically, near to zero detections.

3 - track_method : The ‘Box’ tracking method detects far fewer body parts in frames compared to the ‘Ellipse’ tracking method

@jeylau jeylau closed this by deleting the head repository Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unable to retrieve multiple predictions from maDLC trained network
7 participants