Skip to content

Conversation

@alopezz
Copy link
Contributor

@alopezz alopezz commented Nov 28, 2025

What does this PR do?

It makes sure the clean up after the python build on Windows executes even when errors occur.

Motivation

Cleanup I had taken note for after #42848.

Describe how you validated your changes

Additional Notes

@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Nov 28, 2025
@alopezz alopezz added changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Nov 28, 2025
@cit-pr-commenter
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Nov 28, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 92cd1bf6-d51c-44ab-91a6-64e8f06daa6f

Baseline: 4862c80
Comparison: 026cf2d
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +1.10 [-1.83, +4.02] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +1.10 [-1.83, +4.02] 1 Logs
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +0.57 [+0.37, +0.76] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization +0.36 [+0.22, +0.49] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization +0.29 [+0.05, +0.53] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization +0.26 [+0.17, +0.36] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization +0.12 [-0.06, +0.31] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.38, +0.45] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.11, +0.14] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.36, +0.39] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.12, +0.13] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.08, +0.08] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.06, +0.04] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.39, +0.35] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.09 [-0.13, -0.04] 1 Logs
ddot_logs memory utilization -0.13 [-0.18, -0.07] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.19 [-0.26, -0.12] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.20 [-0.25, -0.15] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
docker_containers_memory memory utilization -0.26 [-0.34, -0.17] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics memory utilization -0.33 [-0.54, -0.12] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.34 [-0.39, -0.29] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization -0.36 [-0.51, -0.20] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.45 [-1.91, +1.01] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization -4.23 [-4.51, -3.94] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs lost_bytes 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@alopezz alopezz marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2025 15:32
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Nov 28, 2025

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 67dadff

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Delta On disk size (MiB) Delta On wire size (MiB)
agent_deb_amd64 $${+0}$$ $${705.04}$$ < $${717.44}$$ $${-0.01}$$ $${172.94}$$ < $${177.37}$$
agent_deb_amd64_fips $${0}$$ $${699.88}$$ < $${711.66}$$ $${+0.01}$$ $${171.7}$$ < $${174.84}$$
agent_heroku_amd64 $${+0}$$ $${326.36}$$ < $${337.57}$$ $${-0}$$ $${87.34}$$ < $${90.78}$$
agent_msi $${-0}$$ $${969.05}$$ < $${1015.38}$$ $${-0.02}$$ $${141.38}$$ < $${149.42}$$
agent_rpm_amd64 $${+0}$$ $${705.03}$$ < $${717.41}$$ $${+0}$$ $${175.93}$$ < $${178.01}$$
agent_rpm_amd64_fips $${0}$$ $${699.87}$$ < $${711.64}$$ $${-0.01}$$ $${173.97}$$ < $${177.26}$$
agent_rpm_arm64 $${0}$$ $${690.71}$$ < $${702.19}$$ $${-0.03}$$ $${159.72}$$ < $${163.22}$$
agent_rpm_arm64_fips $${0}$$ $${686.52}$$ < $${697.6}$$ $${-0.05}$$ $${159.05}$$ < $${162.68}$$
agent_suse_amd64 $${+0}$$ $${705.03}$$ < $${717.41}$$ $${+0}$$ $${175.93}$$ < $${178.01}$$
agent_suse_amd64_fips $${0}$$ $${699.87}$$ < $${711.64}$$ $${-0.01}$$ $${173.97}$$ < $${177.26}$$
agent_suse_arm64 $${0}$$ $${690.71}$$ < $${702.19}$$ $${-0.03}$$ $${159.72}$$ < $${163.22}$$
agent_suse_arm64_fips $${0}$$ $${686.52}$$ < $${697.6}$$ $${-0.05}$$ $${159.05}$$ < $${162.68}$$
docker_agent_amd64 $${0}$$ $${767.38}$$ < $${769.92}$$ $${+0.01}$$ $${260.6}$$ < $${261.52}$$
docker_agent_arm64 $${0}$$ $${777.33}$$ < $${779.46}$$ $${+0.01}$$ $${250.78}$$ < $${251.72}$$
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 $${+0}$$ $${958.26}$$ < $${960.8}$$ $${+0.01}$$ $${329.23}$$ < $${330.15}$$
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 $${0}$$ $${956.93}$$ < $${958.93}$$ $${+0.01}$$ $${315.41}$$ < $${316.35}$$
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 $${0}$$ $${178.85}$$ < $${207.49}$$ $${-0}$$ $${63.16}$$ < $${70.2}$$
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 $${+0}$$ $${196.33}$$ < $${223.38}$$ $${-0}$$ $${59.88}$$ < $${66.42}$$
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 $${+0}$$ $${7.07}$$ < $${7.12}$$ $${-0}$$ $${2.95}$$ < $${3.29}$$
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 $${0}$$ $${6.69}$$ < $${6.92}$$ $${+0}$$ $${2.7}$$ < $${3.07}$$
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 $${0}$$ $${38.58}$$ < $${39.3}$$ $${+0}$$ $${14.91}$$ < $${15.76}$$
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 $${0}$$ $${37.24}$$ < $${37.94}$$ $${-0}$$ $${14.36}$$ < $${14.83}$$
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 $${0}$$ $${29.8}$$ < $${30.53}$$ $${-0}$$ $${7.86}$$ < $${8.75}$$
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 $${0}$$ $${28.31}$$ < $${29.11}$$ $${-0}$$ $${6.8}$$ < $${7.71}$$
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 $${0}$$ $${29.8}$$ < $${30.53}$$ $${+0}$$ $${7.87}$$ < $${8.76}$$
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 $${0}$$ $${29.8}$$ < $${30.53}$$ $${+0}$$ $${7.87}$$ < $${8.76}$$
iot_agent_deb_amd64 $${0}$$ $${42.55}$$ < $${43.19}$$ $${+0}$$ $${11.11}$$ < $${11.98}$$
iot_agent_deb_arm64 $${0}$$ $${40.29}$$ < $${40.92}$$ $${-0}$$ $${9.57}$$ < $${10.45}$$
iot_agent_deb_armhf $${0}$$ $${40.2}$$ < $${40.86}$$ $${+0}$$ $${9.69}$$ < $${10.56}$$
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 $${0}$$ $${42.56}$$ < $${43.19}$$ $${-0}$$ $${11.13}$$ < $${12.0}$$
iot_agent_suse_amd64 $${0}$$ $${42.56}$$ < $${43.19}$$ $${-0}$$ $${11.13}$$ < $${12.0}$$

@alopezz alopezz added the ask-review Ask required teams to review this PR label Dec 1, 2025
@alopezz alopezz requested a review from a team December 1, 2025 15:28
@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Dec 1, 2025
@alopezz alopezz force-pushed the alopez/improve-python-build-bat-error-handling branch from fa3c635 to 026cf2d Compare December 2, 2025 08:56
@alopezz alopezz requested a review from rdesgroppes December 2, 2025 12:48
Comment on lines +9 to +10
set script_errorlevel=0

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
set script_errorlevel=0

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why? Because we're setting this wherever is needed? Because it's effectively a no-op?

Comment on lines +79 to +80
set script_errorlevel=%errorlevel%
goto :cleanup
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
set script_errorlevel=%errorlevel%
goto :cleanup
set script_errorlevel=%errorlevel%
goto :cleanup
exit /b %script_errorlevel%

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The line after the goto would never get executed. It's not a subroutine call, it's a direct jump. I think that also answers most of the other comments.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/goto

Copy link
Contributor

@rdesgroppes rdesgroppes Dec 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

f*k, I confused goto :label (jump) and call :label (routine/function). I'm terribly sorry, @alopezz!

@github-actions github-actions bot added long review PR is complex, plan time to review it and removed medium review PR review might take time labels Dec 2, 2025
Comment on lines +100 to +102
if %script_errorlevel% neq 0 (
exit /b %script_errorlevel%
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if %script_errorlevel% neq 0 (
exit /b %script_errorlevel%
)
exit /b %script_errorlevel%

@alopezz
Copy link
Contributor Author

alopezz commented Dec 2, 2025

/merge

@dd-devflow-routing-codex
Copy link

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Dec 2, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-12-02 16:04:51 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-12-02 16:04:56 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 44m (p90).


2025-12-02 16:29:40 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 9dd3e78 into main Dec 2, 2025
293 of 294 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the alopez/improve-python-build-bat-error-handling branch December 2, 2025 16:29
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.75.0 milestone Dec 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ask-review Ask required teams to review this PR changelog/no-changelog long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants