You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note that the calculation for CMINERT contains PPMFAC while the calculation for CMINESR does not. PPMFAC is the factor that reduces mobilization of carbohydrate/nitrogen reserves due to dormancy. I wonder if it should be the other way around.
It seems to me that dormancy should affect remobilization from the storage organ but not the other tissues. Alternatively, I suppose it might be okay to have it affect root and storage. However, it makes no sense to me that it would affect only root.
Scratch that.
The calculation for CMOBSR already has PPMFAC in it:
The calculation ofCMINESR
is different from the calculation ofCMINERT
inFOR_SENMOB()
:dssat-csm-os/Plant/FORAGE/for_senmob.for
Lines 939 to 944 in e25b199
Note that the calculation forCMINERT
containsPPMFAC
while the calculation forCMINESR
does not.PPMFAC
is the factor that reduces mobilization of carbohydrate/nitrogen reserves due to dormancy. I wonder if it should be the other way around.It seems to me that dormancy should affect remobilization from the storage organ but not the other tissues. Alternatively, I suppose it might be okay to have it affect root and storage. However, it makes no sense to me that it would affect only root.Scratch that.
The calculation for
CMOBSR
already has PPMFAC in it:dssat-csm-os/Plant/FORAGE/for_senmob.for
Lines 866 to 867 in e25b199
I guess it's not wrong. Just confusing. I think we should consider moving PPMFAC down to the place where
CMINESR
is calculated.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: