You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The notebooks introduced #17 and #18 only build a simple decay chain model, constructing $p\gamma$ as a 'virtual' state (s channel) with single, fixed quantum numbers. This is not feasible for GlueX, where t channels dominate.
For this reason, a second set of project notebooks is developed in parallel that build the amplitude through pure SymPy (#13, see also https://github.com/ComPWA/RUB-EP1-AG/issues/144). This does not use an amplitude builder for the decay chain, but should offer the flexibility to build up a correct formulation of the production mechanism.
Additional constraints can be formulated from the final state in order to further simplify the amplitude model. As suggested by @bgrube, a nice example of this can be found in GlueX-doc-4788.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The notebooks introduced #17 and #18 only build a simple decay chain model, constructing pγ as a 'virtual' state (s channel) with single, fixed quantum numbers. This is not feasible for GlueX, where t channels dominate.
For this reason, a second set of project notebooks is developed in parallel that build the amplitude through pure SymPy (#13, see also ComPWA/RUB-EP1-AG#144). This does not use an amplitude builder for the decay chain, but should offer the flexibility to build up a correct formulation of the production mechanism. Additional constraints can be formulated from the final state in order to further simplify the amplitude model. As suggested by @bgrube, a nice example of this can be found in GlueX-doc-4788.
The notebooks introduced #17 and #18 only build a simple decay chain model, constructing$p\gamma$ as a 'virtual' state (s channel) with single, fixed quantum numbers. This is not feasible for GlueX, where t channels dominate.
For this reason, a second set of project notebooks is developed in parallel that build the amplitude through pure SymPy (#13, see also https://github.com/ComPWA/RUB-EP1-AG/issues/144). This does not use an amplitude builder for the decay chain, but should offer the flexibility to build up a correct formulation of the production mechanism.
Additional constraints can be formulated from the final state in order to further simplify the amplitude model. As suggested by @bgrube, a nice example of this can be found in GlueX-doc-4788.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: