Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spin alignment test with a₂ #4

Open
shenvitor opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Spin alignment test with a₂ #4

shenvitor opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
📝 Docs Improvements or additions to documentation Epic Collection of issues

Comments

@shenvitor
Copy link
Member

shenvitor commented Mar 22, 2024

@shenvitor shenvitor self-assigned this Mar 22, 2024
@shenvitor shenvitor changed the title Spin alignment test with a2 Spin alignment test with a_2 Mar 22, 2024
@shenvitor shenvitor changed the title Spin alignment test with a_2 Spin alignment test with $a_2$ Mar 22, 2024
@shenvitor shenvitor changed the title Spin alignment test with $a_2$ Spin alignment test with a2 Mar 22, 2024
@redeboer redeboer transferred this issue from another repository May 10, 2024
@shenvitor shenvitor added Epic Collection of issues 📝 Docs Improvements or additions to documentation labels May 16, 2024
@shenvitor
Copy link
Member Author

shenvitor commented Jun 13, 2024

@redeboer
Maybe this issue means later I should include the use of ampform-dpd?
If so, or this is a separate issue, then maybe I should create a new issue.

@redeboer
Copy link
Member

Yeah probably better to use ampform-dpd. But are you using two subsystems or only the subsystem that has a2?

@shenvitor
Copy link
Member Author

shenvitor commented Jun 13, 2024

Yeah probably better to use ampform-dpd. But are you using two subsystems or only the subsystem that has a2?

As we saw previously: only one subsystem ($\eta \pi^0$: two mesons) can have $a_2$ resonance, the other two subsystems ($\pi p$ and $\eta p$: a meson and a baryon) can't have $a_2$.
So I guess the subsystem that has $a_2$?

Actually, I am wondering if we should also do this to the two subsystems with N* or Delta too later maybe? 🤔

@redeboer
Copy link
Member

Dalitz-Plot Decomposition is only needed if there are multiple subsystems. $\Delta$ with N would be an example, but for the channel with a2 you can also include another resonance that lives in another subsystem (maybe $\Delta$ or N actually, but thought you were studying those in a different final state).

@redeboer redeboer changed the title Spin alignment test with a2 Spin alignment test with a₂ Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📝 Docs Improvements or additions to documentation Epic Collection of issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants