Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some bugs in the near global example #237

Open
simone-silvestri opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Some bugs in the near global example #237

simone-silvestri opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@simone-silvestri
Copy link
Collaborator

simone-silvestri commented Nov 11, 2024

I think there is something wrong in the fluxes with the near-global example. I have ran it locally after it was not running in PR #137 and the results were a little odd.

The simulation is running but the extrema of SST drift extremely quickly, reaching -35 and +47 degree celsius in a month.
This is the video that is produced by the example that shows that temperature increases quite steeply in the tropics.

near_global_ocean_surface.mp4

The output is the following:

[ Info: In-painting ECCO temperature
[ Info: In-painting ECCO salinity
[ Info: Initializing simulation...
[ Info: Iter: 0, time: 0 seconds, Δt: 1.500 minutes, max|u|: (0.00e+00, 0.00e+00, 0.00e+00) m s⁻¹, extrema(T): (31.25, -1.96) ᵒC, wall time: 2.681 minutes
[ Info:     ... simulation initialization complete (6.395 seconds)
[ Info: Executing initial time step...
┌ Warning: Simulation stopped during initialization.
└ @ Oceananigans.Simulations ~/.julia/packages/Oceananigans/s1DfC/src/Simulations/run.jl:129
[ Info:     ... initial time step complete (3.408 minutes).
[ Info: Iter: 4800, time: 5 days, Δt: 1.500 minutes, max|u|: (1.73e+00, 2.26e+00, 1.87e-02) m s⁻¹, extrema(T): (34.14, -10.23) ᵒC, wall time: 40.442 minutes
[ Info: Simulation is stopping after running for 1.289 hours.
[ Info: Simulation time 10 days equals or exceeds stop time 10 days.
[ Info: Iter: 9600, time: 10 days, Δt: 1.500 minutes, max|u|: (2.07e+00, 2.05e+00, 9.71e-03) m s⁻¹, extrema(T): (37.57, -15.24) ᵒC, wall time: 36.879 minutes
[ Info: Initializing simulation...
[ Info:     ... simulation initialization complete (1.970 ms)
[ Info: Executing initial time step...
[ Info:     ... initial time step complete (3.960 seconds).
[ Info: Iter: 10320, time: 15 days, Δt: 10 minutes, max|u|: (1.94e+00, 1.97e+00, 1.61e-02) m s⁻¹, extrema(T): (41.27, -17.67) ᵒC, wall time: 5.780 minutes
[ Info: Iter: 11040, time: 20 days, Δt: 10 minutes, max|u|: (1.79e+00, 1.87e+00, 1.83e-02) m s⁻¹, extrema(T): (42.93, -25.24) ᵒC, wall time: 5.736 minutes
[ Info: Iter: 11760, time: 25 days, Δt: 10 minutes, max|u|: (1.73e+00, 2.56e+00, 1.75e-02) m s⁻¹, extrema(T): (45.31, -31.84) ᵒC, wall time: 5.722 minutes
[ Info: Iter: 12480, time: 30 days, Δt: 10 minutes, max|u|: (2.90e+00, 2.25e+00, 2.19e-02) m s⁻¹, extrema(T): (46.06, -35.93) ᵒC, wall time: 5.718 minutes
@navidcy
Copy link
Collaborator

navidcy commented Nov 11, 2024

Seems that after 5 days we have temperatures of -10. I thought there was a freezing temperature being set at -1.8, no?

@navidcy
Copy link
Collaborator

navidcy commented Nov 11, 2024

Are we sure that the reported values are not from "land" regions?

@navidcy
Copy link
Collaborator

navidcy commented Nov 12, 2024

I confirm that the subfreezing temperatures are in the Arctic. It's not possible to see with the plot above.

@navidcy
Copy link
Collaborator

navidcy commented Nov 12, 2024

What's going on with the speed plot??

@navidcy
Copy link
Collaborator

navidcy commented Nov 12, 2024

OK, the speed plot was just a visualization issue; is fixed in #239.

snapshot

@glwagner glwagner added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 12, 2024
@glwagner
Copy link
Member

Don't we have some validation of the fluxes? Can we re-run the validation?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants