Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it necessary to use such a fine grid for the surface flux example? #166

Open
glwagner opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@glwagner
Copy link
Member

glwagner commented Aug 27, 2024

It makes the example pretty expensive and hard to play around with. Right now the grid is the ECCO2 grid which is 1440 x 720

mask = ecco_mask()
grid = mask.grid
grid = ImmersedBoundaryGrid(grid, GridFittedBoundary(mask))

Also for surface fluxes there is no need to have 50 z-levels, right? Why don't we just use a single z-level? I feel like a 2 degree grid would be better. It's funny that the example claims that the "ECCO2 grid is a good starting point" -- why?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant