You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For workstations that have large memories and typical TB sized hard drives supporting 2 CPUs with multiple cores, how to calculate the optimal settings for the plotting to minimize the time to complete a plot?
From my personal experience.
Plotting time is highly related to the CPU frequency, architecture, and the speed of temporary SSD.
Each plotting task will suggest using 4 threads. It will take half of the CPU time in the process. So every 4 threads can support 2 plotting tasks in optimal.
CPU frequency and architecture really matters. Compare with ZEN1 2.0GHz with ZEN2 4.0GHz, there is more than a 4x time difference between them.
The speed of SSD, in ZEN1 2.0GHz (EPYC7551), each plotting optimal speed needs 80-150MBw/sec. In ZEN2 4.0GHz (3700X), each plotting optimal speed needs 400-600MBw/sec.
The optimal setting for your device really needed to do some experiments. You can try different settings and find the best.
By the way, in all the cases I see. Server CPUs have the worst performance in plotting. Desktop CPUs are usually much better. I guess it based on the speed of memory exchange. If you got a multi-CPU platform, I guess it will get even worse performance because it may cause many memory access latency. You can try anyway.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
For workstations that have large memories and typical TB sized hard drives supporting 2 CPUs with multiple cores, how to calculate the optimal settings for the plotting to minimize the time to complete a plot?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions