Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A specification that will handle solitary Objects tables. #11

Open
gsergeant opened this issue Mar 10, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

A specification that will handle solitary Objects tables. #11

gsergeant opened this issue Mar 10, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@gsergeant
Copy link
Member

As brought up in #9(comment), users could potentially only deposit objects information depending on their tools and research subject of interest (e.g. endpoint feature extraction).

During a quick zoom discussion with @sbesson and @pcmasuzzo, it was decided this will NOT be part of the v0.1 "Tracks" specification (the Links table thus keeping its MUST requirement) but we will instead define some separate "Objects" specification in the future.

The Objects and Tracks specifications could then work on different levels with Tracks inheriting and using the Objects spec, possibly with extra requirements or restrictions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant