You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Starting an attribute list here. Should all metadata about clustering method etc be repeated on each OTU?
There are conceptually two entities, the cluster and the chosen representative sequence, but for now these are flattened in one entity.
If feasable I think we should put all fields into one flattened entity and repeat metadata - it is not safe to assume the entire dataset shares them. We might surely mix some in the catalogue and potentially derived "downloads". The clustering method description is obviously not nice.
As for ID and DOI I guess that is already part of the taxon entity that this links to? but it needs a taxonID to refer to the taxon
to hold information about reference sequence incl cluster method metadata for OTU based taxa.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: