Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test script fails #56

Open
tillea opened this issue Jul 5, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Test script fails #56

tillea opened this issue Jul 5, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@tillea
Copy link

tillea commented Jul 5, 2018

Hi,
if I'm calling the test script tests/test0.sh I get the following diff:

2,3c2,3
< TCCTTGACCAGTTAGCAAGACGATATGCATCAAGTGCACTGGC---GTAAGTCTTTTTAC
< GCTGATCATA--TAGTCCGTATAGTCACTGAACGCCGTCCTCTCG
---
> AGGAACTGGTCACGTTCTGCTATACGTAGTTCACGTGACCGCATTCAGAAAAATGCGACT
> AGTATTGTGATCAGGCATATCAGTGACTTGCGGCAGGAGAGC
6,7c6,7
< TCGTTGGACAGT--GCAAGACGCTATGCATCAAGTGCACTGGCTAGGTAAGTGCGTTTAT
< GATGAGCACAACAGGTCCGGATAGTCCCTGAACGCTATACTCCCG
---
> AGCAACTTGTCACGTTCTGCGATACGTAGTTCACGTGACCGCATTCACGCAAACACTACT
> TGTGCT--GACCATGCATATCAGGGACTTGCGACATGTGGGC
10,11c10,11
< TCGA-CCCCAAA--TTAATACGTTAGTCATCAAGTGCACTGAC---GTAATAGCGTTTAT
< GATGATGAGTACTAGCCCGTGGAAACCCTAAAAGCGTTACCCCCG
---
> AGCATGGTGTCAAGTTCTGCGTTCAGTAGTTAACCAGACGGCATTAACGCTAATACATC-
> -GTGTT--GACCTACCAACGTACGGACTTGCGTAATGTGGTC
14,15c14,15
< TCGTTGAACAGT--GCAAGACGCTATGCATCAAGTGCACTGGC---GTAAGTGCGTTTAT
< GATGAACACAACTGGTCCGTATAGTCCCTGAACGCTGTACTCCCG
---
> AGCAACTTGTCACGTTCTGCGATACGTAGTTCACGTGACCGCATTCACGCAAATACTACT
> TGTGTT--GACCAGGCATATCAGGGACTTGCGACATGAGGGC
18,19c18,19
< TCGTACCACAGT--TCAAGACGCTAGGCATCAAGTGCACTGGC---GTAATTGCGTTTAT
< GATGGACACAACTAGTCCGTTGAATCCCTGAACGCTTTACCCCCG
---
> AGCATGGTGTCAAGTTCTGCGATCCGTAGTTCACGTGACCGCATTAACGCAAATACTACC
> TGTGTT--GATCAGGCAACTTAGGGACTTGCGAAATGGGGGC

I wonder what might be wrong here - dawg or the test itself?
Kind regards, Andreas.

@nileshpatra
Copy link

@reedacartwright could you answer this?

It also looks like tests/test0.dawg is incompatible with the current version of dawg (which outputs dawg 2-current-rUnknown) - could you please confirm this?

Additionally could you please tag a new GitHub release for 2.0? We ship dawg as a Debian package and it'd be really nice if we could have as less delta with the upstream (which is you :-))

@reedacartwright
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't believe that anyone has ever ported the test script to the 2.0 code base. 2.0 is still technically in development which is why I haven't tagged any releases. I will consider your request though.

@tillea
Copy link
Author

tillea commented Nov 8, 2021

Do you have any news?
It is not about this? You talk about porting the test script to version 2.0 - but it fails for version 1.2 which is the latest tagged version.

@reedacartwright
Copy link
Collaborator

Honestly, cleaning up the tests for dawg is low on my priority list until development starts again. I'll review any patches made to improve its tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants