Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make software objectives clearer #29

Open
PonteIneptique opened this issue Jun 8, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Make software objectives clearer #29

PonteIneptique opened this issue Jun 8, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@PonteIneptique
Copy link
Member

Hi everyone, and mostly people not using Capitains at the moment !
In an effort to make our codebase clearer, I tried the following diagram. It will have links to the different repositories or documentation to make things easier. I thought to maybe put it in the front page.

image

What do you think ?

PS : I removed Sparrow as it is not in a good shape right now.

@aurelberra
Copy link

Very nice, and helpful, indeed! It will just need to be polished ("Python" not "python", lowercase "Build", "Build", "Mine").

You could also use your nice little logos where applicable.

I'm wondering how you could make it clear that the paths are or can be complementary: longer paths tend to be felt as better ways?

@PonteIneptique
Copy link
Member Author

So typos are corrected :
image

The issue is I did not want to bloat the graph, the idea is to get links to specific places. But maybe logos would be cool... I'll try and put this here once I find myself with a better internet connection.

The current interactive output is : http://capitains.org/capitains.workflow.html

@PonteIneptique
Copy link
Member Author

I forgot one point : relation between software. I might actually make a second diagram for that, as I fear this would make things WAY too complicated...

@balmas
Copy link
Contributor

balmas commented Jun 11, 2018

this is great

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants