You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The calculation of both CIs UVs and simple UVs seems over excessive.
They all calculate the exact same thing correctly - but it seems error prone to do it in three different ways.
All three implementations calculate the exact same thing, and I would suggest using only one function and letting the other functions just refer to that one function.
The implementation of CIs looks cleanest and I would suggest the others just pointed to that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have merged the functions.
Now UVs and simple_UVs all refer to the CIs function.
I am not satisfied that this is the ideal solution here but will leave it with these references for now. My thinking here is that if a researcher wants to calculate UVs or simple_UVs they should be able to find the formula in the vignette and the function in the package.
@CWWhitney, Thank you for the development of the package! Is it possible to change the colors? which function do you use to change the colors of the CIs-plot?
The calculation of both CIs UVs and simple UVs seems over excessive.
They all calculate the exact same thing correctly - but it seems error prone to do it in three different ways.
All three implementations calculate the exact same thing, and I would suggest using only one function and letting the other functions just refer to that one function.
The implementation of CIs looks cleanest and I would suggest the others just pointed to that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: