From 8101ed33843358ba5751274f90a7f65033264f74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Lippert <8987916+david-lippert@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 10:31:03 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Update open-source-software-prize.md to add GW instance --- open-source-software-prize.md | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/open-source-software-prize.md b/open-source-software-prize.md index 0d1792d..72d1b69 100644 --- a/open-source-software-prize.md +++ b/open-source-software-prize.md @@ -61,6 +61,24 @@ A sample evaluation rubric may include: 3. **Open Source Best Practices**: Evaluated adherence to principles like transparent development, documentation, and community engagement. 4. **Diversity and Inclusion**: May be used as a tie-breaker, prioritizing projects with diverse and inclusive leadership or contributor communities. +Additional evaluation rubrics used by the GW OSPO for their student awards + +**Open Source Project Awards** + +Criteria - judging based on 4 categories evaluated with equal weight +* 25% - Reproducibility - care taken to ensure the project is easily and accurately reproducible +* 25% - Impact - Meaningful and interesting project +* 25% - Adherence to open-source and software development best practices +* 25% - Collaboration - inclusivity, cross discipline, demonstrative community building + +**Individual Contributor Awards** + +Complete applications will be evaluated and must meet a minimum threshold to be entered in the lottery: +* Must include at least one meaningful contribution of code or documentation addressing existing issues and accepted by the maintainer of an existing active Project +* The project you contribute to may be a GW or external project, but our evaluation committee will verify that the contributions are beneficial and not trivial + +Please take care to understand that project maintainers can be extremely busy, so to be a good open source contributor, follow the codes of conduct and contribution guidelines and focus on tackling existing issues that align with your abilities. + # Resulting Context Entrants can be added to the existing project registry of open source projects within the university. @@ -71,7 +89,8 @@ The open source best practices criterion of the scoring rubric can be used as a # Known Instances -[OpenSource@Stanford](https://opensource.stanford.edu/), Stanford Data Science Center for Open and Reproducible Science (CORES), Leland Stanford Junior University +* [OpenSource@Stanford](https://opensource.stanford.edu/), Stanford Data Science Center for Open and Reproducible Science (CORES), Leland Stanford Junior University +* [GW OSPO Student Awards](https://ospo.gwu.edu/student-awards), George Washington University OSPO Student Award Program - Modeled after Stanford's program, with some modifications. # References @@ -86,4 +105,5 @@ The open source best practices criterion of the scoring rubric can be used as a * Clare Dillon [https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6205-0296](https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6205-0296) * Ciara Flanagan [https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3153-7673](https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3153-7673) * Russell Poldrack [https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-0259](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-0259) -* Francesca Vera [https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-3854](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-3854) +* Francesca Vera [https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-3854](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-3854) +* David Lippert [https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6444-9595](https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6444-9595) From 74ad20f040d874aa9dce745b0853c5d380f03fe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Lippert <8987916+david-lippert@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 10:38:30 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Update lunch-and-learn.md gw ospo lunch & learn --- lunch-and-learn.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lunch-and-learn.md b/lunch-and-learn.md index 77003aa..b66abc0 100644 --- a/lunch-and-learn.md +++ b/lunch-and-learn.md @@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ Our investigation and the faculty luncheon resulted in a formal report from the # Known Instances -[Syracuse University OSPO](https://opensource.syracuse.edu/), Syracuse University +* [Syracuse University OSPO](https://opensource.syracuse.edu/), Syracuse University +* [GW Coders Lunch & Learn Series](https://gwcoders.github.io/studyGroup/#events), George Washington University - The GW OSPO partners with the existing GW Coders group to increase the series from bi-weekly to weekly while adding an open source and collaborative development focus to the group. # References From 682b1a2b91a2b824ca56ff0ddb21ef2f655abe4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Lippert <8987916+david-lippert@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 10:40:54 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Update open-source-catalog.md GW OSPO project registry instance --- open-source-catalog.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/open-source-catalog.md b/open-source-catalog.md index c90cc81..8f5ac28 100644 --- a/open-source-catalog.md +++ b/open-source-catalog.md @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ One of the objectives of the university-wide ‘[Open Source Software Prize](htt * [JHU Open Source Programs Office](https://ospo.library.jhu.edu/), Sheridan Libraries, Johns Hopkins University * [Georgia Tech Open Source Program Office](https://ospo.cc.gatech.edu/), Georgia Institute of Technology * [OpenSource@Stanford](https://opensource.stanford.edu/), Stanford Data Science Center for Open and Reproducible Science (CORES), Leland Stanford Junior University +* [GW OSPO Project Registry](https://ospo.gwu.edu/project-registry), George Washington University # References