You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I sometimes need to split a CSV into batches of rows, process them, and then recombine them. It would be convenient if the --filename argument allowed for {} to be zero padded to preserve file sort ordering (during shell scripting; eg., the ls ordering).
For example, when batching into blocks of 30 rows, I'd like to see 000.csv, 030.csv, and so on. Currently, I might see 0.csv, 120.csv, as the ordering with 30.csv appearing later.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I sometimes need to split a CSV into batches of rows, process them, and then recombine them. It would be convenient if the
--filename
argument allowed for{}
to be zero padded to preserve file sort ordering (during shell scripting; eg., thels
ordering).For example, when batching into blocks of 30 rows, I'd like to see
000.csv
,030.csv
, and so on. Currently, I might see0.csv
,120.csv
, as the ordering with30.csv
appearing later.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: