Swift testing #16
Swift testing #16
Conversation
- Redesigned TappableView with a more modern and informative UI - Added comprehensive accessibility features - Implemented visual feedback for touch interactions - Improved gesture recognition and handling - Added descriptive titles, subtitles, and finger count indicators - Implemented smooth animations and haptic feedback - Made layout scrollable and responsive - Enhanced visual design with shadows, rounded corners, and color variations Signed-off-by: Bruno Mazzo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bruno Mazzo <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThis update introduces a major refactor and modularization of the UIUnitTest server, splitting monolithic server logic into focused route handler classes for application, element queries, collection, interaction, state, info, accessibility, coordinates, and utilities. The client’s test suite is expanded with new async/sync UI tests. Predicate handling is migrated from Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant TestSuite as Test Suite (Client)
participant App as App (UIUnitTest)
participant ServerAPI as ServerAPI
participant UIServer as UIServer (Server)
participant RouteHandler as Route Handler (e.g., ElementQueryRoutes)
participant XCUIApplication as XCUIApplication
TestSuite->>App: Create AsyncApi/SyncApi
App->>ServerAPI: callServer(path, request)
ServerAPI->>UIServer: HTTP POST /route
UIServer->>RouteHandler: Handle route (e.g., matchingPredicate)
RouteHandler->>XCUIApplication: Perform UI operation (query, gesture, etc.)
RouteHandler-->>UIServer: Result (success or error)
UIServer-->>ServerAPI: HTTP Response (UIResponse)
ServerAPI-->>App: Decoded response
App-->>TestSuite: Test assertion/result
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Signed-off-by: Bruno Mazzo <[email protected]>
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Nitpick comments (22)
Client/Client/ContentView.swift (1)
10-10: Consider Localization for New Greeting
The hardcoded string"Hello from NeoVim"should be wrapped in a localization API (e.g.LocalizedStringKeyorNSLocalizedString) if the client app supports multiple locales.Server/ServerUITests/UITestServerTest.swift (1)
35-37: Fix trailing whitespace and approve MainActor usage.The
@MainActorannotation is correct sincedeviceId()accessesUIDevice.current.namewhich requires main thread execution.- + @MainActorServer/ServerUITests/XCUIElementTypeQueryProvider+Additions.swift (2)
5-173: Consider refactoring to reduce complexityThe function has a cyclomatic complexity of 81 and spans 166 lines, which makes it difficult to maintain. Consider using a dictionary-based mapping or breaking it down into smaller helper methods.
Example approach using a computed property:
private var queryTypeMapping: [QueryType: KeyPath<XCUIElementTypeQueryProvider, XCUIElementQuery>] { [ .staticTexts: \.staticTexts, .activityIndicators: \.activityIndicators, // ... other mappings ] } func queryBy(_ queryType: QueryType) -> XCUIElementQuery { guard let keyPath = queryTypeMapping[queryType] else { fatalError("Unsupported query type: \(queryType)") } return self[keyPath: keyPath] }
171-171: Remove trailing whitespace} - + return resultQuerygenerate-zip.sh (1)
24-24: Remove or explain commented codeThis line appears to be an alternative build configuration that's been commented out. Either remove it or add a comment explaining why it's preserved.
Lib/Sources/UIUnitTestBuildPlugin/Plugin.swift (1)
9-9: Break long line to comply with line length limitLine exceeds the 120 character limit (currently 146 characters).
- func createBuildCommands(context _: PackagePlugin.PluginContext, target _: PackagePlugin.Target) async throws -> [PackagePlugin.Command] { + func createBuildCommands( + context _: PackagePlugin.PluginContext, + target _: PackagePlugin.Target + ) async throws -> [PackagePlugin.Command] {Client/Client.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/ClientTests - Parallel.xcscheme (1)
19-19: Fix typo in echo message.There's a typo in the echo message: "parant" should be "parent".
- echo "Using parant folder" + echo "Using parent folder"This typo appears in both the PreActions and PostActions scripts.
Also applies to: 37-37
docs/devlog/010 - Long time no see.md (2)
17-17: Fix grammar issues in the NeoVim section.Several grammar issues need correction for better readability:
-This is more a personal change, but I decided to start learn Vim/NewVim. But iOS was really not friendly with it. Luckly I found one plugin recently that was a game changer, and now I'm really trying to do all the development of the lib on it. But it definitly reduced my speed, and I still going to be slower for some time, until I get used with the new tooling. +This is more a personal change, but I decided to start learning Vim/NeoVim. But iOS was really not friendly with it. Luckily, I found one plugin recently that was a game changer, and now I'm really trying to do all the development of the lib on it. But it definitely reduced my speed, and I am still going to be slower for some time, until I get used to the new tooling.
22-23: Fix grammatical inconsistencies in the Changes section.Several grammatical issues need correction:
-- The Async API was changed to match the Sync one. All the methods were the same now, the only difference it that they are `async throws`, but the use properties, subscripts and all match one to one with Apples APIs. -- Swift-Testing are in experimental phase, but the lib supports it. There is some `traits` that I need to dive deeper to understand, but it should work in other projects. +- The Async API was changed to match the Sync one. All the methods are the same now, the only difference is that they are `async throws`, but they use properties, subscripts and all match one-to-one with Apple's APIs. +- Swift-Testing is in experimental phase, but the lib supports it. There are some `traits` that I need to dive deeper to understand, but it should work in other projects.README.md (2)
37-39: Specify language for code block.The code block should have a language specified for proper syntax highlighting.
- ``` + ```text https://github.com/BrunoMazzo/UIUnitTest.git - ``` + ```
116-116: Fix grammar in troubleshooting section.The phrase "scripts have execute permissions" should be "scripts have execution permissions" for better grammar.
-- **Server Not Starting**: Ensure scripts have execute permissions +- **Server Not Starting**: Ensure scripts have execution permissionsClient/ClientTests/TapTests.swift (1)
1-121: Excellent comprehensive tap gesture test suite!This test file demonstrates excellent practices:
- Proper
@MainActorannotation for UI operations- Both async and sync test variants for flexibility
- Comprehensive coverage of tap gestures (single, double, press & hold, multi-finger)
- Clear test structure with appropriate assertions
- Good use of the UIUnitTest framework
Consider grouping related tests using nested test classes for better organization:
@MainActor class TapTests: XCTestCase { class SingleTapTests: XCTestCase { func testTap() async throws { /* ... */ } func testTapSync() { /* ... */ } } class DoubleTapTests: XCTestCase { func testDoubleTap() async throws { /* ... */ } func testDoubleTapSync() { /* ... */ } } // etc. }Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementAttributes.swift (3)
6-18: Simplify variable declaration pattern.The implicitly unwrapped optional pattern is unnecessary here. Consider declaring the variable at the point of assignment for cleaner code.
@MainActor func debugDescription(request: ElementPayload) async throws -> String { - var debugDescription: String! - - if let rootQuery = try? cache.getElementQuery(request.serverId) { - debugDescription = rootQuery.debugDescription - } else if let rootElement = try? cache.getElement(request.serverId) { - debugDescription = rootElement.debugDescription + if let rootQuery = try? cache.getElementQuery(request.serverId) { + return rootQuery.debugDescription + } else if let rootElement = try? cache.getElement(request.serverId) { + return rootElement.debugDescription } else { throw ElementNotFoundError(serverId: request.serverId.uuidString) } - - return debugDescription }
20-85: Clean up trailing whitespace.The methods are well-implemented, but there are trailing whitespace issues flagged by SwiftLint on multiple lines.
Remove trailing whitespace from lines 8, 16, 19, 25, 31, 37, 43, 49, 55, 61, 67, 73, and 79.
8-8: Clean up trailing whitespace.Multiple lines contain trailing whitespace that should be removed for consistent formatting.
Remove the trailing whitespace from the flagged lines to satisfy the linting rules.
Also applies to: 16-16, 19-19, 25-25, 31-31, 37-37, 43-43, 49-49, 55-55, 61-61, 67-67, 73-73, 79-79
Client/Client/TapView.swift (1)
97-114: Fix trailing closure syntax with multiple closures.When passing multiple closure arguments, avoid using trailing closure syntax for clarity.
- Button(action: { + Button( + action: { withAnimation(.easeInOut(duration: 0.3)) { twoFingersTap = false threeFingersTap = false } - }) { + }, + label: { HStack(spacing: 8) { Image(systemName: "arrow.clockwise") Text("Reset All") } // ... rest of label configuration - } + })Client/ClientTests/SwiftTesting.swift (2)
6-414: Consider splitting this large test suite into focused test files.The test suite exceeds recommended size limits (427 lines, type body 262 lines). Consider organizing tests by functionality into separate files for better maintainability.
Suggested organization:
SwiftTestingTapTests.swift- tap-related testsSwiftTestingGestureTests.swift- swipe, pinch, rotate testsSwiftTestingTextTests.swift- text input testsSwiftTestingAppLifecycleTests.swift- home button, launch tests
284-297: Address the sync API blocking issue.The comment indicates sync tests block the main thread in Swift Testing but not XCTest. This architectural issue should be investigated and resolved.
Would you like me to open an issue to track the investigation of this sync API blocking behavior and potential deprecation?
Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/CallServer.swift (2)
35-38: Improve error preservation in error handlingThe current error handling loses the original error type and details by creating a generic NSError.
Consider preserving the original error or including more details:
case let .error(error: error): print(error.error) - throw NSError(domain: "Test", code: 1, userInfo: ["reason": error]) + throw NSError(domain: "UIUnitTest", code: 1, userInfo: [ + NSLocalizedDescriptionKey: error.error, + "originalError": error + ])
85-110: Consider improving synchronization mechanismThe
syncFromMainActorimplementation uses a busy wait loop which could be inefficient.Consider using a semaphore or continuation for more efficient synchronization:
func syncFromMainActor<T: Sendable>(body: @MainActor @escaping () -> T) -> T { if Thread.isMainThread { return MainActor.assumeIsolated { body() } } let semaphore = DispatchSemaphore(value: 0) var result: T! Task { @MainActor in result = body() semaphore.signal() } semaphore.wait() return result }Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (2)
21-112: Refactor route registration for better organizationThe
startmethod is quite long (71 lines). Consider extracting route registration into separate methods by category.func start(portIndex: UInt16 = 0) async throws { let server = HTTPServer( address: .loopback(port: 22087 + portIndex), logger: DisabledLogger.disabled ) self.server = server await registerApplicationRoutes() await registerQueryRoutes() await registerInteractionRoutes() await registerElementAttributeRoutes() await registerUtilityRoutes() let task = Task { try await server.run() } try await server.waitUntilListening() print("Server ready") _ = await task.result } private func registerApplicationRoutes() async { await addRoute("createApp", handler: createApp(request:)) await addRoute("Activate", handler: activate(_:)) } // ... other registration methods
420-422: Avoid force unwrapping in error handlingForce unwrapping in error handling could cause crashes.
func buildError(_ error: String) -> HTTPResponse { - return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .badRequest, body: try! encoder.encode(UIResponse<Bool>(error: error))) + do { + return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .badRequest, body: try encoder.encode(UIResponse<Bool>(error: error))) + } catch { + return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .internalServerError) + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Lib/Sources/UIUnitTestCLI/Resources/PreBuild.zipis excluded by!**/*.zipLib/Sources/UIUnitTestCLI/Resources/Server.zipis excluded by!**/*.zip
📒 Files selected for processing (47)
.github/workflows/ios.yml(2 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)Client/Client.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj(14 hunks)Client/Client.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/Client.xcscheme(1 hunks)Client/Client.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/ClientTests - Parallel.xcscheme(3 hunks)Client/Client.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/LocalTests.xcscheme(1 hunks)Client/Client/ContentView.swift(1 hunks)Client/Client/SwipeView.swift(2 hunks)Client/Client/TapView.swift(1 hunks)Client/ClientTests/ClientTests.swift(4 hunks)Client/ClientTests/SwiftTesting.swift(1 hunks)Client/ClientTests/TapTests.swift(1 hunks)Lib/.swiftpm/xcode/xcshareddata/xcschemes/UIUnitTestCLI.xcscheme(0 hunks)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/AccessibilityAuditType.swift(3 hunks)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/CallServer.swift(1 hunks)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Query/Query.swift(6 hunks)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/XCTest+UI.swift(1 hunks)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTestBuildPlugin/Plugin.swift(1 hunks)Package.resolved(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)Server/Server.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj(5 hunks)Server/Server.xcodeproj/project.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/IDEWorkspaceChecks.plist(0 hunks)Server/Server.xcodeproj/project.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved(1 hunks)Server/Server.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/Server.xcscheme(3 hunks)Server/Server.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/ServerUITests - Debug.xcscheme(2 hunks)Server/Server.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/ServerUITests.xcscheme(1 hunks)Server/Server.xctestplan(2 hunks)Server/Server/ContentView.swift(0 hunks)Server/Server/Info.plist(0 hunks)Server/Server/Server.entitlements(0 hunks)Server/Server/ServerApp.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/GestureVelocityAPI+XCTest.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Coordinate.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementAttributes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Exists.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift(10 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UITestServerTest.swift(2 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/XCUIElementTypeQueryProvider+Additions.swift(1 hunks)Server/UIUnitTestAPI/Sources/API.swift(1 hunks)UIUnitTest.xcworkspace/contents.xcworkspacedata(0 hunks)UIUnitTest.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/IDEWorkspaceChecks.plist(0 hunks)UIUnitTest.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved(0 hunks)docs/devlog/010 - Long time no see.md(1 hunks)generate-zip.sh(1 hunks)makefile(1 hunks)stop-server.sh(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (8)
- Server/Server.xcodeproj/project.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/IDEWorkspaceChecks.plist
- Server/Server/Server.entitlements
- Server/Server/Info.plist
- UIUnitTest.xcworkspace/contents.xcworkspacedata
- UIUnitTest.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/IDEWorkspaceChecks.plist
- Server/Server/ContentView.swift
- Lib/.swiftpm/xcode/xcshareddata/xcschemes/UIUnitTestCLI.xcscheme
- UIUnitTest.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 checkmake (0.2.2)
makefile
[warning] 53-53: Missing required phony target "all"
(minphony)
[warning] 53-53: Missing required phony target "clean"
(minphony)
🪛 GitHub Actions: iOS tests
Server/Server.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/ServerUITests - Debug.xcscheme
[error] 1-1: xcodebuild error: Unable to read project 'Server.xcodeproj'. The project is in a future Xcode project file format (77). Adjust the project format using a compatible version of Xcode.
Server/Server.xcodeproj/project.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved
[error] 1-1: xcodebuild error: Unable to read project 'Server.xcodeproj'. The project is in a future Xcode project file format (77). Adjust the project format using a compatible version of Xcode.
Server/Server.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/ServerUITests.xcscheme
[error] 1-1: xcodebuild error: Unable to read project 'Server.xcodeproj'. The project is in a future Xcode project file format (77). Adjust the project format using a compatible version of Xcode.
Server/Server.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/Server.xcscheme
[error] 1-1: xcodebuild error: Unable to read project 'Server.xcodeproj'. The project is in a future Xcode project file format (77). Adjust the project format using a compatible version of Xcode.
Server/Server.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj
[error] 1-1: xcodebuild error: Unable to read project 'Server.xcodeproj'. The project is in a future Xcode project file format (77). Adjust the project format using a compatible version of Xcode.
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
Server/ServerUITests/UITestServerTest.swift
[Warning] 35-35: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Server/ServerUITests/XCUIElementTypeQueryProvider+Additions.swift
[Error] 5-5: Function should have complexity 10 or less; currently complexity is 81
(cyclomatic_complexity)
[Error] 5-5: Function body should span 100 lines or less excluding comments and whitespace: currently spans 166 lines
(function_body_length)
[Warning] 171-171: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Lib/Sources/UIUnitTestBuildPlugin/Plugin.swift
[Warning] 9-9: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 146 characters
(line_length)
Server/UIUnitTestAPI/Sources/API.swift
[Error] 258-258: Force casts should be avoided
(force_cast)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementAttributes.swift
[Warning] 8-8: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 16-16: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 19-19: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 25-25: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 31-31: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 37-37: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 43-43: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 49-49: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 55-55: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 61-61: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 67-67: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 73-73: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 79-79: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Client/Client/TapView.swift
[Warning] 143-143: Function body should span 50 lines or less excluding comments and whitespace: currently spans 70 lines
(function_body_length)
[Warning] 18-18: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 127 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 247-247: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 161 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 102-102: Trailing closure syntax should not be used when passing more than one closure argument
(multiple_closures_with_trailing_closure)
[Warning] 207-207: Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas
(trailing_comma)
[Warning] 17-17: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 25-25: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 31-31: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 46-46: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 58-58: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 64-64: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 78-78: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 90-90: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 96-96: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 118-118: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 152-152: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 158-158: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 167-167: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 178-178: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 190-190: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 199-199: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 201-201: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 209-209: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 218-218: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 228-228: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 232-232: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 260-260: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Client/ClientTests/SwiftTesting.swift
[Warning] 427-427: File should contain 400 lines or less: currently contains 427
(file_length)
[Warning] 195-195: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 121 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 7-7: Type body should span 250 lines or less excluding comments and whitespace: currently spans 262 lines
(type_body_length)
Client/ClientTests/ClientTests.swift
[Error] 274-274: Function name 'Assert(::file:line:)' should start with a lowercase character
(identifier_name)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift
[Error] 10-10: Variable name 'CurrentServerVersion' should start with a lowercase character
(identifier_name)
[Warning] 21-21: Function body should span 50 lines or less excluding comments and whitespace: currently spans 71 lines
(function_body_length)
[Warning] 62-62: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 123 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 114-114: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 145 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 132-132: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 122 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 338-338: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 122 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 467-467: File should contain 400 lines or less: currently contains 467
(file_length)
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[grammar] ~116-~116: The verb form ‘execute’ does not seem to be suitable in this context.
Context: ...ver Not Starting**: Ensure scripts have execute permissions - Command Not Found: Ve...
(HAVE_VB)
docs/devlog/010 - Long time no see.md
[uncategorized] ~3-~3: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: # Long time no see A lot happened and I was not really working on the lib for...
(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
[style] ~4-~4: Consider using a synonym to be more concise.
Context: ... challenges that I faced with the lib. A lot of things changed on iOS too. A new Swift ...
(A_LOT_OF)
[style] ~5-~5: Consider using a synonym to be more concise.
Context: ...ork. Concurrency is now a big thing and a lot of changes are needed to address it. ## S...
(A_LOT_OF)
[uncategorized] ~17-~17: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...personal change, but I decided to start learn Vim/NewVim. But iOS was really not frie...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)
[uncategorized] ~17-~17: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...was really not friendly with it. Luckly I found one plugin recently that was a ga...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[grammar] ~17-~17: An auxiliary verb seems to be missing from this progressive structure. Did you mean “I'm still going”, “I am still going” or “I was still going”?
Context: ... But it definitly reduced my speed, and I still going to be slower for some time, until I get...
(PRP_VBG)
[uncategorized] ~17-~17: The preposition “to” seems more likely in this position.
Context: ... slower for some time, until I get used with the new tooling. # Changes - The Sync...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION)
[uncategorized] ~21-~21: Use a comma before ‘but’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ... is working on XCTests and Swift-Testing but it required some changes that were not ...
(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
[uncategorized] ~22-~22: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ... to match the Sync one. All the methods were the same now, the only difference it th...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
[uncategorized] ~22-~22: “the” seems less likely than “they”.
Context: ...ce it that they are async throws, but the use properties, subscripts and all matc...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_THE_THEY)
[uncategorized] ~22-~22: It appears that hyphens are missing.
Context: ...se properties, subscripts and all match one to one with Apples APIs. - Swift-Testing are i...
(ONE_ON_ONE_HYPHEN)
[uncategorized] ~22-~22: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...ubscripts and all match one to one with Apples APIs. - Swift-Testing are in experiment...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ...o one with Apples APIs. - Swift-Testing are in experimental phase, but the lib supp...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ...l phase, but the lib supports it. There is some traits that I need to dive deepe...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md
37-37: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🪛 Shellcheck (0.10.0)
generate-zip.sh
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive.
(SC2148)
🔇 Additional comments (42)
stop-server.sh (1)
1-1: Critical fix: Shebang line corrected.The removal of the leading space before
#!/bin/shis essential for the script to be properly recognized and executed by the system. A shebang line must start at column 1 to be valid.Client/Client.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/LocalTests.xcscheme (1)
3-3: Routine Xcode version update.The
LastUpgradeVersionupdate from "1540" to "1610" reflects opening the project with a newer version of Xcode. This is standard metadata maintenance.Client/Client.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/Client.xcscheme (1)
3-3: Consistent Xcode version update.The
LastUpgradeVersionupdate to "1610" is consistent with other scheme files, indicating a coordinated project upgrade to a newer Xcode version.Server/Server/ServerApp.swift (1)
7-7: Verify the UI simplification intent.The root view has been simplified from
ContentView()toText("Hello, world!"), which aligns with the removal ofContentView.swift. Confirm this is the intended final state or if this is a temporary placeholder during refactoring.Server/Server.xctestplan (2)
4-5: Test configuration updated.The configuration ID and name have been updated from "Test Scheme Action" to "Configuration 1". While more generic, this aligns with the broader test infrastructure modernization.
18-18: Target identifier updated.The ServerUITests target identifier has been updated, which should correspond to changes in the Xcode project structure. Ensure this identifier matches the actual target in the project file.
Client/Client/SwipeView.swift (1)
33-46: Simplified gesture handler syntax improves readability.Removal of parentheses in the
.onEndedclosure and around its invocation is correct and makes the code more idiomatic.Package.resolved (1)
2-2: Dependency update looks good.The
swift-argument-parserpin has been updated to version1.5.0with the correct revision and origin hash.Also applies to: 9-10
makefile (1)
53-56: Newreset-simulatorstarget is well-defined.The phony target cleanly resets all Simulator instances and erases data, aligning with the updated iOS testing infrastructure.
.gitignore (1)
52-53: Ignore patterns correctly added.Recursive
**/.uiUnitTest/and*.xcresult/entries will prevent committed UI test artifacts and result bundles from cluttering the repo.Server/Server.xcodeproj/project.xcworkspace/xcshareddata/swiftpm/Package.resolved (1)
2-2: Pinnedflyingfoxversion is consistent.The dependency has been updated from a branch reference to the stable
0.19.0release with the proper revision.Also applies to: 9-10
.github/workflows/ios.yml (1)
11-11: LGTM: Good migration to GitHub-hosted runners.Migrating from self-hosted to
macos-14runners improves consistency, security, and reduces maintenance overhead. This is a best practice for CI/CD workflows.Also applies to: 44-44
Server/ServerUITests/UITestServerTest.swift (1)
7-9: LGTM: Proper concurrency safety with MainActor.The use of
MainActor.assumeIsolatedensures thread-safe access toserver.lastIssueduring issue recording, which is the correct approach for this scenario.Server/Server.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/ServerUITests - Debug.xcscheme (2)
23-24: LGTM: Enabling parallel test execution.Adding
parallelizable="YES"will improve test performance by allowing tests to run concurrently.
3-3: I couldn’t retrieve Xcode versions due to the missingbase64tool. Let’s fetch the raw macos-14 Readme directly and grep for “Xcode”:#!/bin/bash # Directly download the macos-14 runner Readme and list available Xcode entries curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/actions/runner-images/main/images/macos/macos-14-Readme.md \ | grep -A5 -B5 "Xcode"Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/AccessibilityAuditType.swift (2)
2-2: LGTM: Good module organization.Adding the
UIUnitTestAPIimport improves module organization and likely supports the broader API restructuring in this PR.
69-74: LGTM: Clean decoder implementation.Removing the
self.prefixes in the decoder is appropriate since there's no naming ambiguity, and it makes the code more concise.Server/ServerUITests/GestureVelocityAPI+XCTest.swift (1)
4-17: LGTM: Well-designed API bridge.This extension provides a clean conversion between
GestureVelocityAPIandXCUIGestureVelocity. The implementation correctly handles all cases, including the custom case with raw value mapping.Server/Server.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/ServerUITests.xcscheme (1)
1-60: ```shell
#!/bin/bashVerify the project format version in the pbxproj file
grep -En 'archiveVersion|objectVersion' Server/Server.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj
</details> <details> <summary>Server/UIUnitTestAPI/Sources/API.swift (1)</summary> `227-228`: **Verify thread safety of nonisolated(unsafe) NSPredicate** Using `nonisolated(unsafe)` bypasses Swift's concurrency checking for the NSPredicate property. Ensure that NSPredicate instances are truly thread-safe for your use case, as concurrent access could lead to crashes. Consider documenting why this approach is safe, or use a thread-safe wrapper if needed. </details> <details> <summary>Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Exists.swift (1)</summary> `1-31`: **Well-structured existence checking API.** The implementation provides a clean and consistent API for element existence checking. The use of `XCTNSPredicateExpectation` in `waitForNonExistence` is a good approach for waiting for elements to disappear. </details> <details> <summary>README.md (1)</summary> `3-151`: **Excellent documentation expansion.** This is a comprehensive and well-structured README that greatly improves the project's documentation. The coverage of installation, setup, usage examples, and troubleshooting provides excellent value for users. </details> <details> <summary>Server/Server.xcodeproj/xcshareddata/xcschemes/Server.xcscheme (1)</summary> `3-4`: I’m not seeing any CI config for Xcode in `.github/workflows/ios.yml` (or that file may not exist). Let’s list and inspect your workflows to find where you set the macOS runner and Xcode version: ```shell #!/bin/bash echo "Workflows in .github/workflows/:" ls .github/workflows echo; echo "macOS runner entries:" grep -R "runs-on" -n .github/workflows || echo " → none found" echo; echo "Xcode setup actions:" grep -R "setup-xcode" -n .github/workflows || echo " → none found" echo; echo "Explicit Xcode version mentions:" grep -R "xcode-version" -n .github/workflows || echo " → none found"Client/Client.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (2)
613-613: Build configuration updates look appropriate.The build setting changes are well-targeted:
- Updated macOS deployment target to 14.6
- Restricted platforms to iOS only (
iphoneos iphonesimulator)- Disabled Mac Catalyst support
These changes align with focusing the test suite on iOS testing while maintaining compatibility.
Also applies to: 618-620, 639-639, 644-646
21-22: ```shell
#!/bin/bashFind the target associated with the first Frameworks build phase
rg -A5 -B5 "1D136B7A29B45A4600465FB6" Client/Client.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj
Find the target associated with the second Frameworks build phase
rg -A5 -B5 "1DE0F34F29C58B310044AFFC" Client/Client.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj
</details> <details> <summary>Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/XCTest+UI.swift (3)</summary> `8-21`: **Excellent thread safety improvements for SwiftUI view display.** The refactoring to use `@MainActor` and `SendableBox` ensures UI operations are performed safely on the main thread. The pattern of wrapping the view in a `SendableBox` and using `syncFromMainActor` is a robust solution for cross-concurrency boundary UI updates. --- `23-35`: **Good consistency in UIViewController handling.** The UIViewController `showView` function follows the same safe concurrency pattern as the SwiftUI version, maintaining consistency in the API design. --- `50-67`: **Well-implemented Testing module integration.** The conditional import and usage of the Testing module is well-structured: - Proper conditional compilation with `#if canImport(Testing)` - Maintains backward compatibility with XCTest - Provides enhanced source location information when Testing is available </details> <details> <summary>Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Coordinate.swift (1)</summary> `1-67`: **Well-architected coordinate-based UI interaction extension.** This extension demonstrates excellent design principles: - Proper separation of concerns using extension pattern - Consistent `@MainActor` annotation for all UI operations - Comprehensive gesture support (tap, double tap, press, drag variations) - Good cache management for coordinate and element references - Clear method signatures with appropriate error handling The coordinate creation and gesture handling methods provide a solid foundation for complex UI interactions while maintaining thread safety. </details> <details> <summary>Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Query/Query.swift (2)</summary> `52-55`: **Good use of @autoclosure for Sendable compliance.** The `@Sendable @autoclosure` pattern effectively handles NSPredicate in async contexts while maintaining a clean API. --- `128-134`: **Well-designed Sendable wrapper for NSPredicate.** The `NSPredicateSendableBox` provides a clean solution for handling NSPredicate's lack of Sendable conformance in synchronous APIs. Also applies to: 232-237, 254-259 </details> <details> <summary>Client/Client/TapView.swift (1)</summary> `9-127`: **Excellent UI enhancements with improved user experience.** The redesigned interface with clear sections, animations, and visual feedback significantly improves usability. The accessibility considerations are particularly well done. </details> <details> <summary>Client/ClientTests/ClientTests.swift (1)</summary> `5-9`: **Good concurrency annotations for UI tests.** The `@MainActor` and `@unchecked Sendable` annotations appropriately handle the concurrency requirements of UI test classes. </details> <details> <summary>Client/ClientTests/SwiftTesting.swift (1)</summary> `418-427`: **Clean trait implementation for UI test serialization.** The custom `.uiTest` trait provides clear semantics for marking tests that require serialized execution. </details> <details> <summary>Server/Server.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (4)</summary> `275-275`: **Verify iOS 18.0 deployment target requirement** The iOS deployment target has been increased from 15.0 to 18.0. This is a significant jump that will exclude devices running iOS 17 and earlier. Please confirm this is intentional and aligns with your user base requirements. Also applies to: 335-335 --- `283-283`: **Good: Swift strict concurrency enabled** Enabling `SWIFT_STRICT_CONCURRENCY = complete` is excellent for catching potential concurrency issues at compile time, especially with the Swift 6 compatibility updates in this PR. Also applies to: 341-341 --- `458-458`: **Verify default configuration change to Release** The default configuration has been changed from Debug to Release. This might impact the development workflow as developers typically use Debug configuration for day-to-day development. Please confirm this change is intentional. Also applies to: 467-467, 476-476 --- `6-6`: [web_search] ```web Which Xcode version corresponds to pbxproj objectVersion 77?Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/CallServer.swift (1)
6-40: Well-structured server API implementationThe
ServerAPIclass provides a clean, centralized approach for server communication with proper async/await support and type-safe request/response handling.Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (2)
461-467: Good modularization of query handlingThe delegation to
queryByextension method provides better separation of concerns and maintainability.
142-142: Excellent simplification of cache accessThe conversion from asynchronous to synchronous cache access is a great improvement. Since cache operations don't perform I/O, the async overhead was unnecessary. This change improves both performance and code readability.
Also applies to: 151-151, 159-159, 182-182, 185-185, 192-192, 203-203, 210-210, 213-213, 214-214, 221-223, 229-231, 237-239, 245-248
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementAttributes.swift (1)
4-85: Well-structured extension with consistent patterns.The extension provides a clean, consistent API for retrieving UI element attributes with proper:
- Main actor isolation for UI thread safety
- Async/await patterns
- Error handling through cache operations
- Clear method naming and signatures
The implementation follows good Swift concurrency practices and integrates well with the broader UIServer architecture.
Server/ServerUITests/XCUIElementTypeQueryProvider+Additions.swift
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| -IDECustomBuildLocationType=Absolute \ | ||
| -IDECustomBuildProductsPath="$PWD/build/Products" \ | ||
| -derivedDataPath="$PWD/derivedData/" \ | ||
| build-for-testing | xcbeautify || exit 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add dependency check for xcbeautify
The script uses xcbeautify without checking if it's installed, which could cause silent failures.
Add a dependency check:
# Check for required dependencies
if ! command -v xcbeautify &> /dev/null; then
echo "Error: xcbeautify is not installed. Install it using: brew install xcbeautify"
exit 1
fi🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In generate-zip.sh at line 22, the script uses xcbeautify without verifying its
installation, risking silent failures. Add a dependency check before this line
to confirm xcbeautify is installed by using 'command -v xcbeautify'. If not
found, print an error message instructing to install it via Homebrew and exit
the script with status 1.
| @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ | |||
| ## Builds the app, then gets the App and the Test Runner and zips them | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add shebang to the script
The script is missing a shebang declaration, which is required for proper execution and shell identification.
Add this at the beginning of the file:
+#!/bin/bash
+
## Builds the app, then gets the App and the Test Runner and zips them📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ## Builds the app, then gets the App and the Test Runner and zips them | |
| #!/bin/bash | |
| ## Builds the app, then gets the App and the Test Runner and zips them |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck (0.10.0)
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive.
(SC2148)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In generate-zip.sh at line 1, the script lacks a shebang line which is necessary
for the system to identify the interpreter to run the script. Add the
appropriate shebang line, such as #!/bin/bash, at the very top of the file
before any other content to ensure proper execution.
| xcodebuild -project ./Server/Server.xcodeproj \ | ||
| -scheme ServerUITests -sdk iphonesimulator \ | ||
| -destination "platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16,OS=18.0" \ | ||
| -IDEBuildLocationStyle=Custom \ | ||
| -IDECustomBuildLocationType=Absolute \ | ||
| -IDECustomBuildProductsPath="$PWD/build/Products" \ | ||
| -derivedDataPath="$PWD/derivedData/" \ | ||
| build-for-testing | xcbeautify || exit 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Make simulator configuration flexible
The simulator device and OS version are hardcoded, which may cause failures if these specific versions aren't available in the CI environment.
Consider making these configurable:
+# Set default values that can be overridden
+SIMULATOR_NAME="${SIMULATOR_NAME:-iPhone 16}"
+SIMULATOR_OS="${SIMULATOR_OS:-18.0}"
+
xcodebuild -project ./Server/Server.xcodeproj \
-scheme ServerUITests -sdk iphonesimulator \
- -destination "platform=iOS Simulator,name=iPhone 16,OS=18.0" \
+ -destination "platform=iOS Simulator,name=$SIMULATOR_NAME,OS=$SIMULATOR_OS" \🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In generate-zip.sh around lines 15 to 22, the simulator device name and OS
version are hardcoded, which can cause failures if those versions are not
available in the CI environment. Modify the script to accept the simulator
device and OS version as configurable parameters, such as environment variables
or script arguments, and use those variables in the xcodebuild command instead
of hardcoded values.
|
|
||
| let data = try container.decode(Data.self, forKey: .predicate) | ||
|
|
||
| predicate = try NSKeyedUnarchiver.unarchivedObject(ofClasses: [NSPredicate.self], from: data) as! NSPredicate |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid force cast when unarchiving NSPredicate
The force cast could cause a runtime crash if the unarchived object is not an NSPredicate. Use safe casting with proper error handling.
-predicate = try NSKeyedUnarchiver.unarchivedObject(ofClasses: [NSPredicate.self], from: data) as! NSPredicate
+guard let predicate = try NSKeyedUnarchiver.unarchivedObject(ofClasses: [NSPredicate.self], from: data) as? NSPredicate else {
+ throw DecodingError.dataCorruptedError(forKey: .predicate, in: container, debugDescription: "Failed to decode NSPredicate")
+}
+self.predicate = predicate📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| predicate = try NSKeyedUnarchiver.unarchivedObject(ofClasses: [NSPredicate.self], from: data) as! NSPredicate | |
| guard let predicate = try NSKeyedUnarchiver.unarchivedObject(ofClasses: [NSPredicate.self], from: data) as? NSPredicate else { | |
| throw DecodingError.dataCorruptedError(forKey: .predicate, in: container, debugDescription: "Failed to decode NSPredicate") | |
| } | |
| self.predicate = predicate |
🧰 Tools
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
[Error] 258-258: Force casts should be avoided
(force_cast)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/UIUnitTestAPI/Sources/API.swift at line 258, replace the force cast of
the unarchived object to NSPredicate with a safe cast using 'as?' and add
appropriate error handling to manage the case where the cast fails, preventing
potential runtime crashes.
| public func Assert( | ||
| _ value: Bool, | ||
| _ message: @Sendable @autoclosure () -> String = "", | ||
| file: StaticString = #filePath, | ||
| line: UInt = #line | ||
| ) { | ||
| XCTAssert(value, message(), file: file, line: line) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix function naming to follow Swift conventions.
Function names should start with lowercase characters per Swift naming conventions.
-public func Assert(
+public func assert(
_ value: Bool,
_ message: @Sendable @autoclosure () -> String = "",
file: StaticString = #filePath,
line: UInt = #line
) {
XCTAssert(value, message(), file: file, line: line)
}Note: You'll also need to update all call sites from Assert(...) to assert(...).
🧰 Tools
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
[Error] 274-274: Function name 'Assert(::file:line:)' should start with a lowercase character
(identifier_name)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Client/ClientTests/ClientTests.swift around lines 274 to 281, the function
name Assert should be renamed to start with a lowercase letter to follow Swift
naming conventions. Rename the function from Assert to assert and update all
call sites accordingly to use assert(...) instead of Assert(...).
| final class SendableBox<T>: @unchecked Sendable { | ||
| public var value: T? | ||
|
|
||
| switch result.response { | ||
| case .success(data: let response): | ||
| return response | ||
| case .error(error: let error): | ||
| print(error.error) | ||
| throw NSError(domain: "Test", code: 1, userInfo: ["reason": error]) | ||
| init(value: T? = nil) { | ||
| self.value = value | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Thread-unsafe SendableBox implementation
The SendableBox class uses @unchecked Sendable but doesn't provide thread-safe access to its mutable value property. This could lead to data races when accessed from multiple threads.
Consider using Mutex or actor for thread-safe access:
-final class SendableBox<T>: @unchecked Sendable {
- public var value: T?
-
- init(value: T? = nil) {
- self.value = value
- }
-}
+final class SendableBox<T: Sendable>: @unchecked Sendable {
+ private let mutex = Mutex<T?>(nil)
+
+ var value: T? {
+ get { mutex.withLock { $0 } }
+ set { mutex.withLock { $0 = newValue } }
+ }
+
+ init(value: T? = nil) {
+ mutex.withLock { $0 = value }
+ }
+}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/CallServer.swift around lines 42 to 48, the
SendableBox class is marked as @unchecked Sendable but its mutable value
property is not thread-safe, risking data races. To fix this, refactor
SendableBox to ensure thread-safe access by either wrapping the value property
access with a Mutex lock or converting SendableBox into an actor that serializes
access to the value. This will guarantee safe concurrent access and remove the
need for @unchecked Sendable.
| let decoder = JSONDecoder() | ||
| let encoder = JSONEncoder() | ||
|
|
||
| let CurrentServerVersion = 6 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix variable naming convention
Variable names in Swift should start with a lowercase character.
-let CurrentServerVersion = 6
+let currentServerVersion = 6Also update the reference on line 102:
-await self.buildResponse(CurrentServerVersion)
+await self.buildResponse(currentServerVersion)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let CurrentServerVersion = 6 | |
| // At the top of Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (was line 10) | |
| let currentServerVersion = 6 | |
| // …later in the same file, inside start() (was around line 102) | |
| await self.buildResponse(currentServerVersion) |
🧰 Tools
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
[Error] 10-10: Variable name 'CurrentServerVersion' should start with a lowercase character
(identifier_name)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift at line 10, the variable
CurrentServerVersion starts with an uppercase letter, which violates Swift's
naming conventions. Rename it to start with a lowercase letter, such as
currentServerVersion. Also, update all references to this variable accordingly,
including the one on line 102, to use the new lowercase-starting name.
| @MainActor | ||
| func horizontalSizeClass(request: ElementPayload) async throws -> SizeClass { | ||
| let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId) | ||
| return SizeClass(rawValue: element.horizontalSizeClass.rawValue)! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove force unwrapping to prevent potential crashes.
The force unwrapping with ! could cause runtime crashes if the raw values don't match between the XCUIElement size class and your SizeClass enum.
- return SizeClass(rawValue: element.horizontalSizeClass.rawValue)!
+ guard let sizeClass = SizeClass(rawValue: element.horizontalSizeClass.rawValue) else {
+ throw ElementAttributeError.invalidSizeClass(element.horizontalSizeClass.rawValue)
+ }
+ return sizeClassApply similar changes to verticalSizeClass method as well.
Also applies to: 77-77
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementAttributes.swift at lines 71 and 77,
avoid force unwrapping the SizeClass enum initialization from raw values to
prevent runtime crashes. Replace the forced unwrap with safe optional binding or
provide a fallback value to handle cases where the raw value does not match any
enum case. Apply this change similarly to both horizontalSizeClass and
verticalSizeClass methods.
| extension UIServer { | ||
| @MainActor | ||
| func debugDescription(request: ElementPayload) async throws -> String { | ||
| var debugDescription: String! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace implicitly unwrapped optional with safer alternative.
Using an implicitly unwrapped optional here is risky and unnecessary since you're assigning values in all branches.
- var debugDescription: String!
+ let debugDescription: StringThen update the assignments to use direct assignment instead of mutation.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| var debugDescription: String! | |
| let debugDescription: String |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementAttributes.swift at line 7, replace the
implicitly unwrapped optional declaration of debugDescription with a
non-optional String initialized to an empty string or a default value. Then
update all assignments to debugDescription to use direct assignment rather than
mutation, ensuring the variable is safely initialized and used without force
unwrapping.
- Refactor ContentView with grouped test views - Add comprehensive documentation to UIServer and its methods - Update UIServer+Tap with detailed method documentation Signed-off-by: Bruno Mazzo <[email protected]>
- Added detailed documentation comments for AsyncApi and SyncApi classes - Explained methods, parameters, and their behaviors - Improved code readability and understanding Signed-off-by: Bruno Mazzo <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (1)
14-14: Fix variable naming convention.Variable names in Swift should start with a lowercase character.
-let CurrentServerVersion = 6 +let currentServerVersion = 6Also update the reference on line 183:
-await self.buildResponse(CurrentServerVersion) +await self.buildResponse(currentServerVersion)
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
Client/Client/ContentView.swift (2)
4-24: Well-organized test view structure with minor performance consideration.The
testViewGroupsproperty effectively organizes test views into logical categories. The tuple-based structure is clean and maintainable.Consider the performance implications of
AnyViewtype erasure, though for a testing application this is typically acceptable.
27-46: Consider upgrading to NavigationStack for iOS 16+ compatibility.The NavigationView implementation is well-structured with proper ForEach usage and appropriate styling. However,
NavigationViewis deprecated in iOS 16+ in favor ofNavigationStack.// Consider updating to: NavigationStack { List { // ... existing content } .listStyle(.insetGrouped) // Updated syntax .navigationTitle("UI Unit Test Screens") .navigationBarTitleDisplayMode(.large) }Please verify the minimum iOS deployment target to determine if this update is appropriate:
#!/bin/bash # Check the minimum iOS deployment target grep -r "IPHONEOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET" Client/Client.xcodeproj/ || echo "Deployment target not found in xcodeproj" fd -t f -e plist . --exec grep -l "MinimumOSVersion\|LSMinimumSystemVersion" {} \;Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/App.swift (1)
220-226: Fix line length violation.The documentation line exceeds the 120-character limit flagged by SwiftLint.
-/// This class provides synchronous methods for creating, activating, and interacting with an application during UI testing. +/// This class provides synchronous methods for creating, activating, and interacting +/// with an application during UI testing.Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (2)
220-221: Fix line length violations.Several lines exceed the 120-character limit, impacting readability.
- func addRoute<Request: Codable, Response: Codable>(_ route: String, handler: @escaping @MainActor (Request) async throws -> Response) async { + func addRoute<Request: Codable, Response: Codable>( + _ route: String, + handler: @escaping @MainActor (Request) async throws -> Response + ) async {
78-796: Consider breaking down the UIServer class for better modularity.The UIServer class is quite large (325 lines) and handles many responsibilities. Consider breaking it into smaller, focused components using composition or extensions.
Potential approaches:
- Protocol-based separation: Create protocols like
ApplicationManager,ElementQueryHandler,GestureHandler- Extension-based organization: Move related functionality to separate extensions (some already exist)
- Composition: Extract handlers into separate handler classes
This would improve:
- Code maintainability
- Testing capabilities
- Single responsibility principle adherence
- Code discoverability
Example structure:
// Core server class UIServer { let cache = Cache() var server: HTTPServer! // Inject handlers private let applicationHandler: ApplicationHandler private let queryHandler: QueryHandler // etc. } // Separate handler classes class ApplicationHandler { func createApp(request: CreateApplicationRequest) async throws { } func activate(_ activateRequest: ActivateRequest) async throws { } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Client/Client/ContentView.swift(1 hunks)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/App.swift(5 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift(8 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/App.swift
[Warning] 222-222: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 124 characters
(line_length)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift
[Warning] 102-102: Function body should span 50 lines or less excluding comments and whitespace: currently spans 71 lines
(function_body_length)
[Error] 14-14: Variable name 'CurrentServerVersion' should start with a lowercase character
(identifier_name)
[Warning] 143-143: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 123 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 220-220: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 145 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 247-247: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 122 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 78-78: Type body should span 250 lines or less excluding comments and whitespace: currently spans 325 lines
(type_body_length)
[Warning] 643-643: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 122 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 834-834: File should contain 400 lines or less: currently contains 834
(file_length)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Client/Client/ContentView.swift (1)
54-56: Excellent preview implementation for comprehensive UI testing.Adding both light and dark color scheme previews is a best practice for UI testing applications, ensuring the interface works well in both modes.
Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/App.swift (4)
5-20: Excellent API design with comprehensive documentation.The factory functions provide a clean interface for creating both synchronous and asynchronous API instances. The documentation clearly explains the purpose and usage of each variant.
22-28: Well-documented class with appropriate concurrency annotations.The AsyncApi class documentation provides excellent context about its purpose, features, and thread safety. The
@unchecked Sendableannotation is appropriate here since the class manages UI testing operations that need to be sendable across actor boundaries.
156-184: Robust accessibility audit implementation with excellent error handling.The accessibility audit method provides comprehensive parameter documentation and proper error handling for the issue handler closure. The implementation correctly processes each issue and handles both thrown errors and returned boolean values appropriately.
227-328: Well-designed synchronous wrapper with consistent API.The SyncApi class provides an excellent synchronous interface that mirrors the AsyncApi functionality. The use of the Executor pattern to handle async operations synchronously is appropriate for this use case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/ios.yml (2)
15-17: Remove or document commented-out Xcode setup steps.
The commented-outmaxim-lobanov/[email protected]action is duplicated in both jobs. Consider removing stale code or adding a comment explaining when and why to enable it (e.g., via a workflow input or profile).
51-53: Remove or document commented-out Xcode setup steps.
Same optional configuration in the second job. Consolidate or document it once to avoid duplication and confusion.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/ios.yml(2 hunks)makefile(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/ios.yml
14-14: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
50-50: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 checkmake (0.2.2)
makefile
[warning] 53-53: Missing required phony target "all"
(minphony)
[warning] 53-53: Missing required phony target "clean"
(minphony)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/ios.yml (2)
11-11: Whitespace-only cleanup – no action required.
Removed trailing spaces; this change is purely cosmetic.
47-47: Whitespace-only cleanup – no action required.
Removed trailing spaces; this change is purely cosmetic.makefile (2)
10-10: Updated iOS Simulator OS version across xcodebuild commandsThe simulator OS has been bumped from 18.0 to 18.2 for the
test,test-parallel, andgenerate-ziptargets to keep all builds and tests in sync with the current environment. This change looks consistent across the Makefile.Also applies to: 23-23, 38-38
53-56: Addreset-simulatorstarget to clear Simulator stateIntroducing this phony target to kill all Simulator processes and erase simulator data is a great way to ensure a clean slate before running tests or builds.
- Split route registration into 9 logical groups: * Application lifecycle routes (createApp, activate) * Element querying routes (firstMatch, elementFromQuery, etc.) * Element interaction routes (tap, swipe, scroll, etc.) * Element state routes (exists, value, isHittable, etc.) * Element information routes (identifier, title, label, etc.) * Element collection routes (count, descendants, children, etc.) * Coordinate-based routes * Accessibility routes * Utility routes (stop, alive, server-version) - Improved code organization and maintainability - Added comprehensive documentation for each route group - Simplified the start() method by using grouped registration methods - No breaking changes to existing API functionality
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (1)
14-14: Fix variable naming conventionVariable names in Swift should start with a lowercase character.
-let CurrentServerVersion = 6 +let currentServerVersion = 6Also update the reference on line 881:
-await self.buildResponse(CurrentServerVersion) +await self.buildResponse(currentServerVersion)
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (3)
154-154: Reduce line length for better readabilityThis line exceeds the 120 character limit. Consider breaking it into multiple lines.
- func addRoute<Request: Codable, Response: Codable>(_ route: String, handler: @escaping @MainActor (Request) async throws -> Response) async { + func addRoute<Request: Codable, Response: Codable>( + _ route: String, + handler: @escaping @MainActor (Request) async throws -> Response + ) async {
838-838: Reduce line length for consistencyThis line exceeds the 120 character limit.
- await addRoute("allElementsBoundByAccessibilityElement", handler: allElementsBoundByAccessibilityElement(request:)) + await addRoute( + "allElementsBoundByAccessibilityElement", + handler: allElementsBoundByAccessibilityElement(request:) + )
78-884: Consider further modularization to reduce file sizeThe UIServer class spans 352 lines and the entire file is 922 lines, which impacts maintainability. Since you've already created extension files for specific functionality (UIServer+Coordinate.swift, UIServer+ElementAttributes.swift, etc.), consider moving the corresponding method implementations from this file to those extensions. This would:
- Reduce the main file size
- Improve code organization
- Make the codebase easier to navigate
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift(8 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/XCUIElementTypeQueryProvider+Additions.swift(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Server/ServerUITests/XCUIElementTypeQueryProvider+Additions.swift
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift
[Error] 14-14: Variable name 'CurrentServerVersion' should start with a lowercase character
(identifier_name)
[Warning] 154-154: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 145 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 181-181: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 122 characters
(line_length)
[Error] 78-78: Type body should span 350 lines or less excluding comments and whitespace: currently spans 352 lines
(type_body_length)
[Warning] 577-577: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 122 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 838-838: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 123 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 922-922: File should contain 400 lines or less: currently contains 922
(file_length)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Normal simulator
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (1)
102-127: Great refactoring of the start method!The modularization of route registration into grouped methods significantly improves code organization and maintainability. This successfully addresses the previous concern about the method being too long.
Update compiled binaries with double tap functionality
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Element/Element.swift (1)
208-208: Consider error handling approach in assertion methods.The assertion methods use
try?to handle exceptions, which means network errors or server communication failures will be treated as element non-existence. This might mask legitimate infrastructure issues that should fail the test differently than element existence checks.Consider differentiating between element existence results and communication errors:
- if (try? await exists) ?? false { + do { + if try await exists { + return self + } + } catch { + // Re-throw communication errors rather than treating as non-existence + throw error + }Apply similar changes to both assertion methods and their existence/non-existence checks.
Also applies to: 245-245
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (1)
14-14: Variable naming convention violation (duplicate issue)This issue was already identified in previous reviews. The variable name should follow Swift's camelCase convention.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift (1)
25-27: Consider extracting HomeButton handler for consistency.The HomeButton route uses an inline closure while other routes reference handler methods. For consistency and better organization, consider extracting this to a separate handler method.
- await addRoute("HomeButton", handler: { (_: HomeButtonRequest) in - XCUIDevice.shared.press(.home) - }) + await addRoute("HomeButton", handler: homeButton(request:))Then add a corresponding handler method in the main UIServer class:
@MainActor func homeButton(request: HomeButtonRequest) async throws { XCUIDevice.shared.press(.home) }Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Element/Element.swift (1)
218-218: Fix grammar error in error message.The error message has a grammatical error: "doesn't exists" should be "doesn't exist".
- let fallbackMessage = try await "Element \(identifier) doesn't exists" + let fallbackMessage = try await "Element \(identifier) doesn't exist"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
Client/Client/Assets.xcassets/AppIcon.appiconset/ChatGPT Image Jun 23, 2025 at 06_53_06 PM.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngLib/Sources/UIUnitTestCLI/Resources/PreBuild.zipis excluded by!**/*.zipLib/Sources/UIUnitTestCLI/Resources/Server.zipis excluded by!**/*.zipServer/Server/Media.xcassets/AppIcon.appiconset/ChatGPT Image Jun 23, 2025 at 06_55_35 PM.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
Client/Client/Assets.xcassets/AppIcon.appiconset/Contents.json(1 hunks)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Element/Element.swift(9 hunks)Server/Server/Media.xcassets/AppIcon.appiconset/Contents.json(1 hunks)Server/Server/Media.xcassets/Contents.json(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+AccessibilityRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ApplicationRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+CoordinateRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementStateRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift(8 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- Server/Server/Media.xcassets/Contents.json
- Client/Client/Assets.xcassets/AppIcon.appiconset/Contents.json
- Server/Server/Media.xcassets/AppIcon.appiconset/Contents.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (6)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ApplicationRoutes.swift (1)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (4)
addRoute(154-170)addRoute(181-186)createApp(196-204)activate(214-218)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+AccessibilityRoutes.swift (1)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (3)
addRoute(154-170)addRoute(181-186)performAccessibilityAudit(232-255)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementStateRoutes.swift (2)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (4)
addRoute(154-170)addRoute(181-186)value(421-427)isHittable(506-510)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Exists.swift (1)
exists(5-11)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift (1)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (1)
buildResponse(713-719)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift (1)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (9)
addRoute(154-170)addRoute(181-186)firstMatch(266-274)elementFromQuery(287-303)elementMatchingPredicate(314-323)matchingPredicate(335-341)matchingByIdentifier(352-358)containingPredicate(370-376)containingElementType(388-396)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+CoordinateRoutes.swift (3)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (2)
addRoute(154-170)addRoute(181-186)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Element/Element.swift (1)
coordinate(142-150)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Coordinate.swift (2)
coordinateWithOffset(20-33)coordinateTap(35-65)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloned simulator
🔇 Additional comments (17)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift (2)
21-23: LGTM!The alive endpoint provides a clean health check mechanism.
26-26: Verify CurrentServerVersion is properly defined and accessible.The code references
CurrentServerVersionbut it's not imported or defined in this file. Ensure this constant is properly accessible.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify CurrentServerVersion is defined and accessible in the codebase # Expected: Find the definition of CurrentServerVersion # Search for CurrentServerVersion definition rg -A 3 "CurrentServerVersion\s*=" --type swift # Search for CurrentServerVersion usage rg "CurrentServerVersion" --type swiftServer/ServerUITests/UIServer+ApplicationRoutes.swift (1)
11-14: LGTM!Clean modularization of application lifecycle routes. The handler methods are properly defined in the main UIServer class and the route registration follows the established pattern.
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift (1)
20-32: LGTM!Excellent modularization of element information routes. The comprehensive documentation and consistent use of the
addRoutepattern makes this extension clear and maintainable.Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+AccessibilityRoutes.swift (1)
10-12: LGTM!Clean registration of accessibility audit route. The handler method properly handles iOS version compatibility as shown in the relevant code snippets.
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementStateRoutes.swift (1)
14-20: LGTM!Well-organized element state routes with clear documentation. The handler methods are properly defined in the main UIServer class and the registration follows the established pattern consistently.
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift (1)
17-28: LGTM: Well-structured route registration.The route registration follows a clean, consistent pattern with clear documentation. The async registration and handler delegation provide good separation of concerns.
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+CoordinateRoutes.swift (1)
12-16: LGTM: Consistent route registration pattern.The coordinate routes follow the established pattern with clear documentation and proper handler delegation. The implementation is clean and maintainable.
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift (1)
20-32: LGTM: Comprehensive element collection route coverage.This extension provides extensive element collection functionality with consistent handler delegation and clear documentation. The route organization enhances the modular structure of the UIServer.
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift (1)
16-24: LGTM: Well-organized element query routes.The element query routes are well-documented and follow the consistent pattern established in other route extensions. The handler delegation maintains good separation of concerns.
Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Element/Element.swift (2)
189-224: LGTM: Valuable assertion methods with comprehensive documentation.The new assertion methods provide excellent test validation capabilities with proper timeout handling and detailed documentation. The synchronous wrappers maintain API consistency.
Also applies to: 295-317
5-9: LGTM: Excellent documentation improvements.The comprehensive documentation additions significantly improve the API's usability by clearly explaining the purpose and behavior of the Element and SyncElement classes.
Also applies to: 263-263
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (5)
16-77: Excellent comprehensive documentationThe extensive class-level documentation provides clear insights into the server's architecture, features, and use cases. This significantly improves code maintainability and developer experience.
102-127: Well-refactored start methodThe start method has been successfully refactored to address the previous concern about excessive length. The modular route registration approach significantly improves readability and maintainability.
154-186: Robust route registration with proper error handlingThe
addRoutemethods provide excellent type safety and comprehensive error handling. The automatic reset oflastIssuebefore each request is a good practice for maintaining clean state.
763-769: Clean extension implementationThe new
performQueryextension provides a clean separation of concerns and delegates appropriately to the query'squeryBymethod.
216-218: To confirm that allget…methods in yourCacheclass have been converted to synchronous signatures, let’s locate the file(s) definingclass Cacheand inspect their method declarations:#!/bin/bash echo "Locating files containing 'class Cache':" CACHE_FILES=$(rg -l "class Cache" --type swift) echo "$CACHE_FILES" for file in $CACHE_FILES; do echo -e "\n---- $file ----" echo "get* method signatures:" rg -n "func get" "$file" echo echo "async usage in this file:" rg -n "async" "$file" done
| await self.server.appendRoute(HTTPRoute(stringLiteral: "stop"), to: ClosureHTTPHandler { _ in | ||
| Task { | ||
| await self.server.stop(timeout: 10) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return await self.buildResponse(true) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential race condition in stop route.
The stop route returns a response immediately but starts an asynchronous task to stop the server. This creates a race condition where the client receives a success response before the server actually stops, and any server shutdown errors are silently ignored.
Consider one of these approaches:
await self.server.appendRoute(HTTPRoute(stringLiteral: "stop"), to: ClosureHTTPHandler { _ in
- Task {
- await self.server.stop(timeout: 10)
- }
-
- return await self.buildResponse(true)
+ do {
+ await self.server.stop(timeout: 10)
+ return await self.buildResponse(true)
+ } catch {
+ return await self.buildError("Failed to stop server: \(error.localizedDescription)")
+ }
})Or if immediate response is required for testing purposes, add proper error handling:
await self.server.appendRoute(HTTPRoute(stringLiteral: "stop"), to: ClosureHTTPHandler { _ in
Task {
- await self.server.stop(timeout: 10)
+ do {
+ await self.server.stop(timeout: 10)
+ } catch {
+ print("Server stop failed: \(error)")
+ }
}
return await self.buildResponse(true)
})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await self.server.appendRoute(HTTPRoute(stringLiteral: "stop"), to: ClosureHTTPHandler { _ in | |
| Task { | |
| await self.server.stop(timeout: 10) | |
| } | |
| return await self.buildResponse(true) | |
| }) | |
| await self.server.appendRoute(HTTPRoute(stringLiteral: "stop"), to: ClosureHTTPHandler { _ in | |
| do { | |
| await self.server.stop(timeout: 10) | |
| return await self.buildResponse(true) | |
| } catch { | |
| return await self.buildError("Failed to stop server: \(error.localizedDescription)") | |
| } | |
| }) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift around lines 13 to 19, the
stop route currently returns a success response immediately while stopping the
server asynchronously, causing a race condition and ignoring shutdown errors. To
fix this, modify the route handler to await the server.stop call directly before
returning the response, ensuring the server has stopped successfully.
Alternatively, if immediate response is necessary, add proper error handling
inside the asynchronous task to log or handle any errors during shutdown.
The Cache class has been renamed to ServerState to better reflect its role in managing server-side state and resources. This includes: - Renaming the class definition - Updating all references to use the new name - Rebuilding resource bundles with the changes Signed-off-by: Bruno Mazzo <[email protected]>
This commit includes several major improvements to the server codebase: 1. Code Organization: - Moved coordinate-related code to dedicated file - Separated route handlers into specific files by functionality - Improved code structure for better maintainability 2. Documentation: - Added detailed documentation for all route handlers - Included parameter descriptions and return value explanations - Added error handling documentation - Improved code readability with clear function purposes 3. Implementation: - Added accessibility routes for UI testing - Enhanced application management routes - Improved element collection handling - Added comprehensive element info routes - Enhanced element state management - Added interaction routes for UI manipulation - Improved utility routes for server management These changes make the codebase more maintainable, better documented, and easier to understand for future development. Signed-off-by: Bruno Mazzo <[email protected]>
- Updated UIServer.start() to use route registration methods from extension files - Removed duplicate route handler implementations from main UIServer class - Moved all route handlers to their respective extension files: - Application routes (createApp, activate) - Element query routes (firstMatch, elementFromQuery, etc.) - Interaction routes (typeText, scroll, swipe, pinch, rotate) - Element state routes (exists, waitForExistence, value, isHittable) - Element collection routes (count, queryDescendants, children, etc.) - Accessibility routes (performAccessibilityAudit) - Coordinate routes (coordinate, coordinateWithOffset, coordinateTap) - Utility routes (stop, alive, server-version) - Cleaned up main UIServer class to focus on core functionality - Improved code organization and maintainability - Fixed cache type reference from ServerState to Cache This refactoring provides better separation of concerns and makes the codebase more modular and maintainable. Signed-off-by: Bruno Mazzo <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift (1)
13-19: Fix potential race condition in stop route.The stop route returns a response immediately but starts an asynchronous task to stop the server. This creates a race condition where the client receives a success response before the server actually stops, and any server shutdown errors are silently ignored.
Consider awaiting the server stop directly:
await self.server.appendRoute(HTTPRoute(stringLiteral: "stop"), to: ClosureHTTPHandler { _ in - Task { - await self.server.stop(timeout: 10) - } - - return await self.buildResponse(true) + do { + await self.server.stop(timeout: 10) + return await self.buildResponse(true) + } catch { + return HTTPResponse( + statusCode: .internalServerError, + body: HTTPBody(text: "Failed to stop server: \(error.localizedDescription)") + ) + } })Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (2)
14-14: Fix variable naming convention.Variable names in Swift should start with a lowercase character.
-let CurrentServerVersion = 6 +let currentServerVersion = 6Also update the reference in the buildResponse method where this variable is used.
14-14: Fix variable naming convention.Variable names in Swift should start with a lowercase character.
-let CurrentServerVersion = 6 +let currentServerVersion = 6Also update the reference if it exists elsewhere in the codebase.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (1)
154-170: Add input validation for route registration.The
addRoutemethod doesn't validate input parameters. Consider adding validation for route names and handler presence to prevent runtime issues.func addRoute<Request: Codable, Response: Codable>(_ route: String, handler: @escaping @MainActor (Request) async throws -> Response) async { + guard !route.isEmpty else { + fatalError("Route name cannot be empty") + } + await server.appendRoute(HTTPRoute(stringLiteral: route), handler: { @MainActor request inServer/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift (1)
133-140: Consider renaming for clarity.The method
allElementsBoundByIndexusesElementsByAccessibilityas the request type, which could be confusing. Consider using a more generic request type or renaming it toElementsByIndexfor better semantic clarity.-func allElementsBoundByIndex(request: ElementsByAccessibility) async throws -> ElementArrayResponse { +func allElementsBoundByIndex(request: ElementsByIndex) async throws -> ElementArrayResponse {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Lib/Sources/UIUnitTestCLI/Resources/PreBuild.zipis excluded by!**/*.zipLib/Sources/UIUnitTestCLI/Resources/Server.zipis excluded by!**/*.zip
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
Server/ServerUITests/Cache.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+AccessibilityRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ApplicationRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+CoordinateRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementStateRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift(5 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Server/ServerUITests/Cache.swift
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementStateRoutes.swift
- Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+AccessibilityRoutes.swift
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (4)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ApplicationRoutes.swift (2)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (2)
addRoute(154-170)addRoute(181-186)Server/ServerUITests/Cache.swift (1)
getApplication(53-59)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift (5)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (3)
findElement(200-204)performQuery(239-243)toXCUIElementType(209-211)Server/ServerUITests/Cache.swift (1)
getElementQuery(77-85)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift (1)
element(177-182)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift (2)
identifier(43-47)elementType(148-152)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift (1)
matchingPredicate(104-110)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+CoordinateRoutes.swift (6)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (2)
addRoute(154-170)addRoute(181-186)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Element/Element.swift (1)
coordinate(142-150)Server/ServerUITests/Cache.swift (2)
getElement(69-75)getCoordinate(87-93)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift (1)
element(177-182)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/UICoordinate.swift (1)
withOffset(25-33)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift (1)
doubleTap(80-85)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift (6)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (2)
addRoute(154-170)addRoute(181-186)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Element/Element.swift (3)
typeText(77-80)scroll(69-72)coordinate(142-150)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift (1)
element(177-182)Server/ServerUITests/Cache.swift (2)
getElement(69-75)getCoordinate(87-93)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+CoordinateRoutes.swift (1)
coordinate(18-32)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Element/Element+Swipe.swift (4)
swipeUp(11-13)swipeDown(15-17)swipeLeft(19-21)swipeRight(23-25)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Normal simulator
🔇 Additional comments (16)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift (1)
1-198: Well-structured element info routes implementation.The extension provides a comprehensive set of element property retrieval routes with consistent implementation patterns, proper error handling through the cache layer, and excellent documentation.
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ApplicationRoutes.swift (1)
1-76: Excellent modular architecture with dependency injection.The introduction of the
ApplicationRoutesclass andRouteRegisteringprotocol demonstrates good architectural practices:
- Clean separation of concerns
- Dependency injection for testability
- Protocol-based abstraction
- Consistent with SOLID principles
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+CoordinateRoutes.swift (1)
1-80: Well-implemented coordinate handling routes.The coordinate routes properly handle:
- Creation of coordinates with normalized offsets
- Offset application to existing coordinates
- Various tap gestures with appropriate velocity conversion
- Consistent caching of both coordinates and referenced elements
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift (5)
16-24: LGTM! Well-structured route registration.The route registration method is clean and follows a consistent pattern. The comprehensive documentation in the method header clearly explains each route's purpose.
35-43: LGTM! Proper async/await and caching usage.The
firstMatchmethod correctly uses@MainActorfor thread safety and follows the established pattern of synchronous cache access. Error handling is appropriately delegated to the calling infrastructure.
16-24: LGTM! Well-structured route registration.The route registration method is clean and follows a consistent pattern. The documentation clearly explains what each route does.
57-72: Good implementation with flexible element selection.The
elementFromQuerymethod provides multiple ways to select elements (by index, type, or default). The logic is clear and well-documented.
36-43: Cache method usage is correct and intentional.After inspecting
Server/ServerUITests/Cache.swift, both methods are defined distinctly:
func getQuery(_ id: UUID) throws -> XCUIElementTypeQueryProviderfunc getElementQuery(_ id: UUID) throws -> XCUIElementQueryIn
firstMatch, callingcache.getQueryis appropriate to access thefirstMatchproperty on any query provider. All other routes require a fullXCUIElementQuery(e.g. to call.matching(...),.element(matching:), etc.), so they correctly usecache.getElementQuery. No changes required.Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift (3)
20-32: LGTM! Comprehensive route registration.The route registration method properly organizes all element collection operations with clear, descriptive route names.
20-32: LGTM! Comprehensive route registration.The route registration covers all necessary element collection operations with clear method mappings.
152-166: Excellent error handling pattern.The
childrenmethod demonstrates a robust pattern by trying bothgetElementQueryandgetElementwith proper fallback to a custom error. This flexibility allows the method to work with both queries and individual elements.Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (5)
110-118: LGTM! Excellent modular refactoring.The refactored route registration approach greatly improves maintainability by grouping related functionality into separate methods. This addresses the previous concern about the monolithic
startmethod.
90-90: Verify cache class naming.The AI summary mentions that the cache class was renamed from
CachetoServerState, but the code still showsCache(). Please verify if this renaming occurred or if there's an inconsistency.#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if Cache class was renamed to ServerState # Expected: Find the actual class definition and its current name echo "Searching for Cache class definition:" ast-grep --pattern 'class Cache { $$$ }' echo -e "\nSearching for ServerState class definition:" ast-grep --pattern 'class ServerState { $$$ }' echo -e "\nSearching for all Cache references:" rg "Cache\(\)" -A 1 -B 1 echo -e "\nSearching for all ServerState references:" rg "ServerState\(\)" -A 1 -B 1Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
109-119: LGTM! Excellent refactoring of route registration.The modular approach to route registration significantly improves maintainability and addresses the previous review feedback about the monolithic
startmethod. Each route group is now clearly separated and manageable.
154-186: Well-designed route registration abstraction.The dual
addRoutemethods provide excellent type safety and flexibility:
- One for handlers that return responses
- One for handlers that return void (wrapped to return boolean)
The error handling and JSON encoding/decoding is properly centralized.
200-204: Good synchronous cache usage pattern.The synchronous cache access aligns with the overall refactoring to remove unnecessary async/await calls for cache operations. This simplifies the code and improves performance.
| func swipe(request: SwipeRequest) async throws -> Bool { | ||
| let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId) | ||
|
|
||
| switch request.direction { | ||
| case .up: | ||
| element.swipeUp() | ||
| case .down: | ||
| element.swipeDown() | ||
| case .left: | ||
| element.swipeLeft() | ||
| case .right: | ||
| element.swipeRight() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Swipe velocity parameter is not being used.
The swipe method doesn't utilize the velocity parameter that's likely present in SwipeRequest. Based on the codebase patterns, swipe methods support velocity parameters.
Apply this fix to use the velocity parameter:
@MainActor
func swipe(request: SwipeRequest) async throws -> Bool {
let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId)
switch request.direction {
case .up:
- element.swipeUp()
+ element.swipeUp(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity)
case .down:
- element.swipeDown()
+ element.swipeDown(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity)
case .left:
- element.swipeLeft()
+ element.swipeLeft(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity)
case .right:
- element.swipeRight()
+ element.swipeRight(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity)
}
return true
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func swipe(request: SwipeRequest) async throws -> Bool { | |
| let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId) | |
| switch request.direction { | |
| case .up: | |
| element.swipeUp() | |
| case .down: | |
| element.swipeDown() | |
| case .left: | |
| element.swipeLeft() | |
| case .right: | |
| element.swipeRight() | |
| } | |
| return true | |
| } | |
| func swipe(request: SwipeRequest) async throws -> Bool { | |
| let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId) | |
| switch request.direction { | |
| case .up: | |
| element.swipeUp(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity) | |
| case .down: | |
| element.swipeDown(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity) | |
| case .left: | |
| element.swipeLeft(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity) | |
| case .right: | |
| element.swipeRight(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity) | |
| } | |
| return true | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift between lines 129 and
144, the swipe method does not use the velocity parameter from the SwipeRequest
object. To fix this, update each swipe call (swipeUp, swipeDown, swipeLeft,
swipeRight) to include the velocity parameter from the request, ensuring the
swipe action respects the intended speed.
| if let index = elementFromQuery.index { | ||
| element = query.element(boundBy: index) | ||
| } else if let type = elementFromQuery.elementType { | ||
| element = query.element(matching: type.toXCUIElementType(), identifier: elementFromQuery.identifier) | ||
| } else { | ||
| element = query.element | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add bounds checking for array index access.
The elementFromQuery method doesn't validate that the provided index is within bounds before calling query.element(boundBy: index). This could lead to runtime crashes if an invalid index is provided.
Consider adding bounds validation:
let element: XCUIElement
if let index = elementFromQuery.index {
+ guard index >= 0 && index < query.count else {
+ throw IndexOutOfBoundsError(index: index, count: query.count)
+ }
element = query.element(boundBy: index)
} else if let type = elementFromQuery.elementType {Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift around lines 61 to 67,
the code accesses query.element(boundBy: index) without checking if index is
within the valid range, risking runtime crashes. Add a bounds check to ensure
index is greater than or equal to zero and less than query.count before
accessing the element. If the index is out of bounds, handle it gracefully, such
as by returning nil or a default element, to prevent crashes.
| func remove(request: ElementPayload) async -> Bool { | ||
| cache.remove(request.serverId) | ||
|
|
||
| return true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Return accurate success indicator for remove operation.
The remove method always returns true regardless of whether the element was actually present in the cache. This could mislead clients about the operation's success.
Consider returning the actual result from the cache removal:
@MainActor
func remove(request: ElementPayload) async -> Bool {
- cache.remove(request.serverId)
-
- return true
+ return cache.remove(request.serverId)
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func remove(request: ElementPayload) async -> Bool { | |
| cache.remove(request.serverId) | |
| return true | |
| } | |
| @MainActor | |
| func remove(request: ElementPayload) async -> Bool { | |
| return cache.remove(request.serverId) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift around lines 209
to 213, the remove method always returns true without checking if the element
was actually removed from the cache. Modify the method to return a Boolean
indicating whether the removal was successful by using the return value of the
cache.remove call, so clients get an accurate success indicator.
| func children(request: ChildrenMatchinType) async throws -> QueryResponse { | ||
| var childrenQuery: XCUIElementQuery | ||
|
|
||
| if let rootQuery = try? cache.getElementQuery(request.serverId) { | ||
| childrenQuery = rootQuery.children(matching: request.elementType.toXCUIElementType()) | ||
| } else if let rootElement = try? cache.getElement(request.serverId) { | ||
| childrenQuery = rootElement.children(matching: request.elementType.toXCUIElementType()) | ||
| } else { | ||
| throw ElementNotFoundError(serverId: request.serverId.uuidString) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| let id = cache.add(query: childrenQuery) | ||
|
|
||
| return QueryResponse(serverId: id) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling in children method.
The current implementation uses try? to check both getElementQuery and getElement, which could mask real errors. Only if both fail does it throw ElementNotFoundError, but other errors (like corruption or validation failures) would be silently ignored.
Consider explicit error handling:
@MainActor
func children(request: ChildrenMatchinType) async throws -> QueryResponse {
var childrenQuery: XCUIElementQuery
- if let rootQuery = try? cache.getElementQuery(request.serverId) {
+ do {
+ let rootQuery = try cache.getElementQuery(request.serverId)
childrenQuery = rootQuery.children(matching: request.elementType.toXCUIElementType())
- } else if let rootElement = try? cache.getElement(request.serverId) {
+ } catch {
+ do {
+ let rootElement = try cache.getElement(request.serverId)
childrenQuery = rootElement.children(matching: request.elementType.toXCUIElementType())
- } else {
+ } catch {
throw ElementNotFoundError(serverId: request.serverId.uuidString)
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func children(request: ChildrenMatchinType) async throws -> QueryResponse { | |
| var childrenQuery: XCUIElementQuery | |
| if let rootQuery = try? cache.getElementQuery(request.serverId) { | |
| childrenQuery = rootQuery.children(matching: request.elementType.toXCUIElementType()) | |
| } else if let rootElement = try? cache.getElement(request.serverId) { | |
| childrenQuery = rootElement.children(matching: request.elementType.toXCUIElementType()) | |
| } else { | |
| throw ElementNotFoundError(serverId: request.serverId.uuidString) | |
| } | |
| let id = cache.add(query: childrenQuery) | |
| return QueryResponse(serverId: id) | |
| } | |
| @MainActor | |
| func children(request: ChildrenMatchinType) async throws -> QueryResponse { | |
| var childrenQuery: XCUIElementQuery | |
| do { | |
| let rootQuery = try cache.getElementQuery(request.serverId) | |
| childrenQuery = rootQuery.children(matching: request.elementType.toXCUIElementType()) | |
| } catch { | |
| do { | |
| let rootElement = try cache.getElement(request.serverId) | |
| childrenQuery = rootElement.children(matching: request.elementType.toXCUIElementType()) | |
| } catch { | |
| throw ElementNotFoundError(serverId: request.serverId.uuidString) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| let id = cache.add(query: childrenQuery) | |
| return QueryResponse(serverId: id) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift around lines 152
to 166, the children method uses try? which silently ignores errors from
getElementQuery and getElement, potentially masking real issues. Refactor the
method to explicitly catch and handle errors from these calls. If
getElementQuery or getElement throws an error other than element not found,
propagate or handle it properly instead of ignoring. Only throw
ElementNotFoundError when both calls fail due to the element truly being absent.
| return self.buildError(error.localizedDescription) | ||
| } | ||
| func buildError(_ error: String) -> HTTPResponse { | ||
| return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .badRequest, body: try! encoder.encode(UIResponse<Bool>(error: error))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace force unwrapping with proper error handling.
Similar to the previous comment, using try! for error response encoding could cause the server to crash when trying to report an error.
-return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .badRequest, body: try! encoder.encode(UIResponse<Bool>(error: error)))
+do {
+ let body = try encoder.encode(UIResponse<Bool>(error: error))
+ return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .badRequest, body: body)
+} catch {
+ return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .internalServerError, body: Data())
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .badRequest, body: try! encoder.encode(UIResponse<Bool>(error: error))) | |
| do { | |
| let body = try encoder.encode(UIResponse<Bool>(error: error)) | |
| return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .badRequest, body: body) | |
| } catch { | |
| return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .internalServerError, body: Data()) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift at line 197, replace the force unwrap
`try!` used for encoding the error response with proper error handling. Use a
do-catch block or a try? expression to safely handle encoding errors and return
an appropriate fallback response or log the error instead of crashing the
server.
| return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .ok, body: try! encoder.encode(UIResponse(response: data))) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace force unwrapping with proper error handling.
Using try! for JSON encoding could crash the server if encoding fails. This is particularly risky in a server environment where reliability is crucial.
-return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .ok, body: try! encoder.encode(UIResponse(response: data)))
+do {
+ let body = try encoder.encode(UIResponse(response: data))
+ return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .ok, body: body)
+} catch {
+ return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .internalServerError, body: Data())
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .ok, body: try! encoder.encode(UIResponse(response: data))) | |
| } | |
| do { | |
| let body = try encoder.encode(UIResponse(response: data)) | |
| return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .ok, body: body) | |
| } catch { | |
| return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .internalServerError, body: Data()) | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift around lines 192 to 193, the use of
`try!` for JSON encoding can cause the server to crash if encoding fails.
Replace the force unwrapping with proper error handling by using a do-catch
block or a try? expression to safely handle encoding errors and return an
appropriate HTTP error response instead of crashing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
♻️ Duplicate comments (8)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift (1)
13-19: Fix potential race condition in stop route.The stop route returns a response immediately but starts an asynchronous task to stop the server. This creates a race condition where the client receives a success response before the server actually stops.
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift (1)
116-131: Swipe velocity parameter is not being used.The
swipemethod doesn't utilize the velocity parameter fromSwipeRequest. The swipe calls should include the velocity parameter for proper gesture simulation.Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (4)
14-14: Fix variable naming convention.Variable names in Swift should start with a lowercase character.
90-90: Replace Cache instantiation with ServerState.The class was renamed from
CachetoServerStatebut the instantiation still uses the old type name.
192-193: Replace force unwrapping with proper error handling.Using
try!for JSON encoding could crash the server if encoding fails. This is particularly risky in a server environment.
197-197: Replace force unwrapping with proper error handling.Similar to the previous comment, using
try!for error response encoding could cause the server to crash when trying to report an error.Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift (2)
152-166: Improve error handling in children method.The current implementation uses
try?to check bothgetElementQueryandgetElement, which could mask real errors. Other errors like corruption or validation failures would be silently ignored.
210-214: Return accurate success indicator for remove operation.The
removemethod always returnstrueregardless of whether the element was actually present in the cache. This could mislead clients about the operation's success.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift (1)
44-207: Consider refactoring the large switch statement for maintainability.The
performQuerymethod contains a large switch statement with 63 cases. While functionally correct, this could be made more maintainable by using a dictionary-based mapping approach.Consider creating a static mapping dictionary:
private static let queryTypeMapping: [QueryType: KeyPath<XCUIElementQuery, XCUIElementQuery>] = [ .staticTexts: \.staticTexts, .buttons: \.buttons, .checkBoxes: \.checkBoxes, // ... other mappings ] func performQuery(queryRequest: QueryRequest) async throws -> XCUIElementQuery { let rootElementQuery = try await self.cache.getQuery(queryRequest.serverId) guard let keyPath = Self.queryTypeMapping[queryRequest.queryType] else { throw QueryError.unsupportedQueryType(queryRequest.queryType) } return rootElementQuery[keyPath: keyPath] }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Lib/Sources/UIUnitTestCLI/Resources/PreBuild.zipis excluded by!**/*.zipLib/Sources/UIUnitTestCLI/Resources/Server.zipis excluded by!**/*.zip
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementAttributes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementStateRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift(4 hunks)Server/UIUnitTestAPI/Sources/API.swift(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift
- Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementAttributes.swift
- Server/UIUnitTestAPI/Sources/API.swift
- Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementStateRoutes.swift
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloned simulator
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (1)
109-118: Well-structured modular route registration.The refactoring to use grouped route registration methods significantly improves code organization and maintainability. This modular approach makes it easier to understand and maintain different aspects of the UI testing functionality.
| case .cells: | ||
| resultQuery = rootElementQuery.cells | ||
| case .checkBoxes: | ||
| resultQuery = rootElementQuery.staticTexts |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect mapping for checkBoxes query type.
The .checkBoxes case is incorrectly mapped to rootElementQuery.staticTexts instead of rootElementQuery.checkBoxes.
case .checkBoxes:
- resultQuery = rootElementQuery.staticTexts
+ resultQuery = rootElementQuery.checkBoxes📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| resultQuery = rootElementQuery.staticTexts | |
| case .checkBoxes: | |
| resultQuery = rootElementQuery.checkBoxes |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift at line 58, the query for
the .checkBoxes case is incorrectly assigned to rootElementQuery.staticTexts.
Change this assignment to rootElementQuery.checkBoxes to correctly map the
.checkBoxes query type.
| @MainActor | ||
| func verticalSizeClass(request: ElementPayload) async throws -> SizeClass { | ||
| let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId) | ||
| return SizeClass(rawValue: element.verticalSizeClass.rawValue)! | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace force unwrapping with proper error handling.
Similar to the horizontal size class method, this force unwrapping could cause crashes if the raw value is invalid.
@MainActor
func verticalSizeClass(request: ElementPayload) async throws -> SizeClass {
let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId)
- return SizeClass(rawValue: element.verticalSizeClass.rawValue)!
+ guard let sizeClass = SizeClass(rawValue: element.verticalSizeClass.rawValue) else {
+ throw SizeClassError.invalidRawValue(element.verticalSizeClass.rawValue)
+ }
+ return sizeClass
}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift around lines 133 to
137, the method verticalSizeClass force unwraps the SizeClass initializer which
can cause a crash if the raw value is invalid. Replace the force unwrap with
safe error handling by using optional binding or throwing an error if the raw
value does not correspond to a valid SizeClass. This will prevent runtime
crashes and handle invalid data gracefully.
| func horizontalSizeClass(request: ElementPayload) async throws -> SizeClass { | ||
| let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId) | ||
| return SizeClass(rawValue: element.horizontalSizeClass.rawValue)! | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace force unwrapping with proper error handling.
The force unwrapping of SizeClass(rawValue:)! could cause crashes if the raw value doesn't map to a valid SizeClass case.
@MainActor
func horizontalSizeClass(request: ElementPayload) async throws -> SizeClass {
let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId)
- return SizeClass(rawValue: element.horizontalSizeClass.rawValue)!
+ guard let sizeClass = SizeClass(rawValue: element.horizontalSizeClass.rawValue) else {
+ throw SizeClassError.invalidRawValue(element.horizontalSizeClass.rawValue)
+ }
+ return sizeClass
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func horizontalSizeClass(request: ElementPayload) async throws -> SizeClass { | |
| let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId) | |
| return SizeClass(rawValue: element.horizontalSizeClass.rawValue)! | |
| } | |
| @MainActor | |
| func horizontalSizeClass(request: ElementPayload) async throws -> SizeClass { | |
| let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId) | |
| guard let sizeClass = SizeClass(rawValue: element.horizontalSizeClass.rawValue) else { | |
| throw SizeClassError.invalidRawValue(element.horizontalSizeClass.rawValue) | |
| } | |
| return sizeClass | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift around lines 119 to
122, the force unwrapping of SizeClass(rawValue:) can cause runtime crashes if
the raw value is invalid. Replace the force unwrap with safe unwrapping using
guard or if let, and throw a descriptive error or handle the failure case
appropriately to avoid crashes.
| func tapElement(tapRequest: TapElementRequest) throws -> Bool { | ||
| guard let element = try? cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId) else { | ||
| return false | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if let duration = tapRequest.duration { | ||
| element.press(forDuration: duration) | ||
| } else if let numberOfTouches = tapRequest.numberOfTouches { | ||
| if let numberOfTaps = tapRequest.numberOfTaps { | ||
| element.tap(withNumberOfTaps: numberOfTaps, numberOfTouches: numberOfTouches) | ||
| } else { | ||
| element.twoFingerTap() | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| element.tap() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Inconsistent return types across interaction methods.
The interaction methods have inconsistent return types - tapElement returns Bool while doubleTap returns Void. This inconsistency makes the API confusing for clients.
Consider standardizing return types across all interaction methods:
@MainActor
-func doubleTap(tapRequest: ElementPayload) throws -> Void {
+func doubleTap(tapRequest: ElementPayload) throws -> Bool {
let element = try cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId)
element.doubleTap()
+ return true
}Also applies to: 70-73
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift around lines 40 to 58
and 70 to 73, the interaction methods have inconsistent return types, with
tapElement returning Bool and doubleTap returning Void. To fix this, standardize
the return types across all interaction methods by choosing either Bool or Void
consistently. Update the method signatures and their implementations accordingly
to ensure uniformity in the API.
| func element(request: ByIdRequest) async -> ElementPayload { | ||
| let rootElementQuery = try! self.cache.getElementQuery(request.queryRoot) | ||
| let newElement = rootElementQuery[request.identifier] | ||
| let id = self.cache.add(element: newElement) | ||
| return ElementPayload(serverId: id) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace force unwrapping with proper error handling.
The element method uses try! which could crash the server if the query retrieval fails.
@MainActor
func element(request: ByIdRequest) async -> ElementPayload {
- let rootElementQuery = try! self.cache.getElementQuery(request.queryRoot)
+ let rootElementQuery = try self.cache.getElementQuery(request.queryRoot)
let newElement = rootElementQuery[request.identifier]
let id = self.cache.add(element: newElement)
return ElementPayload(serverId: id)
}Also update the method signature to handle the throwing:
-func element(request: ByIdRequest) async -> ElementPayload {
+func element(request: ByIdRequest) async throws -> ElementPayload {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func element(request: ByIdRequest) async -> ElementPayload { | |
| let rootElementQuery = try! self.cache.getElementQuery(request.queryRoot) | |
| let newElement = rootElementQuery[request.identifier] | |
| let id = self.cache.add(element: newElement) | |
| return ElementPayload(serverId: id) | |
| } | |
| @MainActor | |
| func element(request: ByIdRequest) async throws -> ElementPayload { | |
| let rootElementQuery = try self.cache.getElementQuery(request.queryRoot) | |
| let newElement = rootElementQuery[request.identifier] | |
| let id = self.cache.add(element: newElement) | |
| return ElementPayload(serverId: id) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift around lines 178
to 183, replace the force unwrap `try!` with proper error handling by making the
method `throws` and using `try` instead of `try!` when calling
`self.cache.getElementQuery`. Update the method signature to include `throws`
and propagate any errors instead of crashing.
…plicationRoutes pattern for improved maintainability and testability 🤖 Generated with [opencode](https://opencode.ai) Co-Authored-By: opencode <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
♻️ Duplicate comments (10)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift (2)
124-139: Swipe velocity parameter is not being used.The
swipemethod doesn't utilize the velocity parameter that's likely present inSwipeRequest. Based on the codebase patterns, swipe methods support velocity parameters.Apply this fix to use the velocity parameter:
private func swipe(request: SwipeRequest) throws -> Bool { let element = try cache.getElement(request.serverId) - switch request.swipeDirection { + switch request.direction { case .up: - element.swipeUp() + element.swipeUp(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity) case .down: - element.swipeDown() + element.swipeDown(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity) case .left: - element.swipeLeft() + element.swipeLeft(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity) case .right: - element.swipeRight() + element.swipeRight(velocity: request.velocity.xcUIGestureVelocity) } return true }
52-70: Inconsistent return types across interaction methods.The interaction methods have inconsistent return types -
tapElementreturnsBoolwhiledoubleTapreturnsVoid. This inconsistency makes the API confusing for clients.Consider standardizing return types across all interaction methods:
-private func doubleTap(tapRequest: ElementPayload) throws -> Void { +private func doubleTap(tapRequest: ElementPayload) throws -> Bool { let element = try cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId) element.doubleTap() + return true }Also applies to: 81-84
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (2)
14-14: Fix variable naming convention.Variable names in Swift should start with a lowercase character.
-let CurrentServerVersion = 6 +let currentServerVersion = 6Also update the reference in the file where it's used.
192-193: Replace force unwrapping with proper error handling.Using
try!for JSON encoding could crash the server if encoding fails. This is particularly risky in a server environment where reliability is crucial.-return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .ok, body: try! encoder.encode(UIResponse(response: data))) +do { + let body = try encoder.encode(UIResponse(response: data)) + return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .ok, body: body) +} catch { + return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .internalServerError, body: Data()) +}-return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .badRequest, body: try! encoder.encode(UIResponse<Bool>(error: error))) +do { + let body = try encoder.encode(UIResponse<Bool>(error: error)) + return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .badRequest, body: body) +} catch { + return HTTPResponse(statusCode: .internalServerError, body: Data()) +}Also applies to: 197-197
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift (1)
72-78: Add bounds checking for array index access.The
elementFromQuerymethod doesn't validate that the provided index is within bounds before callingquery.element(boundBy: index). This could lead to runtime crashes if an invalid index is provided.Consider adding bounds validation:
let element: XCUIElement if let index = elementFromQuery.index { + guard index >= 0 && index < query.count else { + throw IndexOutOfBoundsError(index: index, count: query.count) + } element = query.element(boundBy: index) } else if let type = elementFromQuery.elementType {Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift (3)
216-220: Return accurate success indicator for remove operation.The
removemethod always returnstrueregardless of whether the element was actually present in the cache. This could mislead clients about the operation's success.Consider returning the actual result from the cache removal:
private func remove(request: ElementPayload) async -> Bool { - cache.remove(request.serverId) - - return true + return cache.remove(request.serverId) }
161-175: Improve error handling in children method.The current implementation uses
try?to check bothgetElementQueryandgetElement, which could mask real errors. Only if both fail does it throwElementNotFoundError, but other errors would be silently ignored.Consider explicit error handling:
private func children(request: ChildrenMatchinType) async throws -> QueryResponse { var childrenQuery: XCUIElementQuery - if let rootQuery = try? cache.getElementQuery(request.serverId) { + do { + let rootQuery = try cache.getElementQuery(request.serverId) childrenQuery = rootQuery.children(matching: request.elementType.toXCUIElementType()) - } else if let rootElement = try? cache.getElement(request.serverId) { + } catch { + do { + let rootElement = try cache.getElement(request.serverId) childrenQuery = rootElement.children(matching: request.elementType.toXCUIElementType()) - } else { + } catch { throw ElementNotFoundError(serverId: request.serverId.uuidString) + } }
186-191: Replace force unwrapping with proper error handling.The
elementmethod usestry!which could crash the server if the query retrieval fails.-private func element(request: ByIdRequest) async -> ElementPayload { +private func element(request: ByIdRequest) async throws -> ElementPayload { - let rootElementQuery = try! self.cache.getElementQuery(request.queryRoot) + let rootElementQuery = try self.cache.getElementQuery(request.queryRoot) let newElement = rootElementQuery[request.identifier] let id = self.cache.add(element: newElement) return ElementPayload(serverId: id) }Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift (2)
146-149: Force unwrapping can cause crashes - needs safe error handling.The force unwrapping of
SizeClass(rawValue:)!could cause crashes if the raw value doesn't map to a valid case. This issue was already identified in previous reviews.
160-163: Force unwrapping can cause crashes - needs safe error handling.Similar to horizontalSizeClass, the force unwrapping here could cause crashes if the raw value is invalid. This issue was already identified in previous reviews.
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift (2)
59-229: Refactor to reduce complexity and improve maintainability.The
performQuerymethod has high cyclomatic complexity (81) and spans 167 lines due to the exhaustive switch statement. Consider refactoring using a mapping approach to improve maintainability.+private static let queryTypeMapping: [QueryType: KeyPath<XCUIElementTypeQueryProvider, XCUIElementQuery>] = [ + .staticTexts: \.staticTexts, + .activityIndicators: \.activityIndicators, + .alerts: \.alerts, + // ... add all mappings +] + @MainActor func performQuery(queryRequest: QueryRequest) async throws -> XCUIElementQuery { let rootElementQuery = try await self.cache.getQuery(queryRequest.serverId) - let resultQuery: XCUIElementQuery - switch queryRequest.queryType { - case .staticTexts: - resultQuery = rootElementQuery.staticTexts - // ... 80+ more cases - } - - return resultQuery + guard let keyPath = Self.queryTypeMapping[queryRequest.queryType] else { + throw NSError(domain: "UIServer", code: 0, userInfo: [NSLocalizedDescriptionKey: "Unsupported query type"]) + } + + return rootElementQuery[keyPath: keyPath] }Alternatively, implement this mapping in the
XCUIElementTypeQueryProvider+Additions.swiftextension if it exists in your codebase.
10-10: Remove trailing whitespace.- private let server: UIServer - + private let server: UIServer +- } - + } +Also applies to: 17-17
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift (1)
11-11: Remove trailing whitespace.- private let routeRegistrar: RouteRegistering - + private let routeRegistrar: RouteRegistering +- } - + } +Also applies to: 20-20
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+AccessibilityRoutes.swift (2)
46-49: Break long line to comply with line length limit.- try app.performAccessibilityAudit(for: request.accessibilityAuditType.toXCUIAccessibilityAuditType()) { issue in + let auditType = request.accessibilityAuditType.toXCUIAccessibilityAuditType() + try app.performAccessibilityAudit(for: auditType) { issue in issues.append(issue) return true }
11-11: Remove trailing whitespace.- private let routeRegistrar: RouteRegistering - + private let routeRegistrar: RouteRegistering +- } - + } +Also applies to: 20-20
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ApplicationRoutes.swift (2)
63-63: Break long line to comply with line length limit.- func addRoute<Request: Codable, Response: Codable>(_ route: String, handler: @escaping @MainActor (Request) async throws -> Response) async + func addRoute<Request: Codable, Response: Codable>( + _ route: String, + handler: @escaping @MainActor (Request) async throws -> Response + ) async
11-11: Remove trailing whitespace.- private let routeRegistrar: RouteRegistering - + private let routeRegistrar: RouteRegistering +- } - + } +Also applies to: 20-20
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+CoordinateRoutes.swift (1)
11-11: Remove trailing whitespace.- private let routeRegistrar: RouteRegistering - + private let routeRegistrar: RouteRegistering +- } - + } +Also applies to: 20-20
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementStateRoutes.swift (1)
11-11: Remove trailing whitespace.Lines 11 and 20 have trailing whitespace that should be removed.
- private let routeRegistrar: RouteRegistering - + private let routeRegistrar: RouteRegistering +- } - + } +Also applies to: 20-20
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift (2)
81-81: Remove redundantVoidreturn type.SwiftLint correctly identifies that returning
Voidin function declarations is redundant.-private func doubleTap(tapRequest: ElementPayload) throws -> Void { +private func doubleTap(tapRequest: ElementPayload) throws { -private func typeText(request: EnterTextRequest) throws -> Void { +private func typeText(request: EnterTextRequest) throws {Also applies to: 95-95
11-11: Remove trailing whitespace.Lines 11 and 20 have trailing whitespace that should be removed.
Also applies to: 20-20
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift (1)
11-11: Remove trailing whitespace.Lines 11 and 20 have trailing whitespace that should be removed.
Also applies to: 20-20
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift (2)
12-12: Remove trailing whitespace.Lines 12 and 23 have trailing whitespace that should be removed.
Also applies to: 23-23
222-234: Avoid implicitly unwrapped optional.The
debugDescriptionvariable doesn't need to be an implicitly unwrapped optional.private func debugDescription(request: ElementPayload) async throws -> String { - var debugDescription: String! - if let rootQuery = try? cache.getElementQuery(request.serverId) { - debugDescription = rootQuery.debugDescription + return rootQuery.debugDescription } else if let rootElement = try? cache.getElement(request.serverId) { - debugDescription = rootElement.debugDescription + return rootElement.debugDescription } else { throw ElementNotFoundError(serverId: request.serverId.uuidString) } - - return debugDescription }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+AccessibilityRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ApplicationRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+CoordinateRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementStateRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift(1 hunks)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift (5)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift (3)
registerRoutes(30-41)tapElement(52-70)doubleTap(81-84)Server/ServerUITests/Cache.swift (1)
getElement(69-75)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Element/Element+Tap.swift (2)
tap(5-9)tap(17-21)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/UICoordinate.swift (2)
tap(35-38)doubleTap(40-43)Lib/Sources/UIUnitTest/Element/Element+DoubleTap.swift (2)
doubleTap(5-9)doubleTap(13-17)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift (4)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift (3)
registerRoutes(33-45)elementType(118-121)identifier(47-50)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift (3)
registerRoutes(36-48)query(202-206)element(186-191)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (3)
addRoute(154-170)addRoute(181-186)toXCUIElementType(203-205)Server/ServerUITests/Cache.swift (2)
getQuery(61-67)getElementQuery(77-85)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift (4)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift (1)
registerRoutes(29-37)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift (2)
registerRoutes(36-48)element(186-191)Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (2)
addRoute(154-170)addRoute(181-186)Server/ServerUITests/Cache.swift (1)
getElement(69-75)
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift
[Warning] 11-11: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 20-20: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+CoordinateRoutes.swift
[Warning] 11-11: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 20-20: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift
[Error] 59-59: Function should have complexity 10 or less; currently complexity is 81
(cyclomatic_complexity)
[Error] 59-59: Function body should span 100 lines or less excluding comments and whitespace: currently spans 167 lines
(function_body_length)
[Warning] 10-10: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 17-17: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+AccessibilityRoutes.swift
[Warning] 46-46: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 124 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 11-11: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 20-20: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift
[Warning] 81-81: Returning Void in a function declaration is redundant
(redundant_void_return)
[Warning] 95-95: Returning Void in a function declaration is redundant
(redundant_void_return)
[Warning] 11-11: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 20-20: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementQueryRoutes.swift
[Warning] 11-11: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 20-20: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift
[Error] 14-14: Variable name 'CurrentServerVersion' should start with a lowercase character
(identifier_name)
[Warning] 154-154: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 145 characters
(line_length)
[Error] 192-192: Force tries should be avoided
(force_try)
[Error] 197-197: Force tries should be avoided
(force_try)
[Warning] 181-181: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 122 characters
(line_length)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementCollectionRoutes.swift
[Error] 187-187: Force tries should be avoided
(force_try)
[Warning] 41-41: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 138 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 111-111: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 122 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 125-125: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 128 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 12-12: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 23-23: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift
[Warning] 11-11: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 20-20: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 46-46: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 51-51: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 56-56: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 61-61: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ApplicationRoutes.swift
[Warning] 63-63: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 143 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 11-11: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 20-20: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementStateRoutes.swift
[Warning] 11-11: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Warning] 20-20: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
🪛 GitHub Check: Cloned simulator
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+UtilityRoutes.swift
[warning] 60-60:
no 'async' operations occur within 'await' expression
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Normal simulator
🔇 Additional comments (10)
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ApplicationRoutes.swift (1)
1-77: Well-structured implementation of application lifecycle routes.The modular design with
ApplicationRoutesclass andRouteRegisteringprotocol provides good separation of concerns and maintainability.Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+CoordinateRoutes.swift (1)
1-99: Excellent implementation of coordinate-based routes.The implementation provides comprehensive support for coordinate-based interactions with proper caching, error handling, and support for complex gestures like press-drag-hold with velocity.
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementStateRoutes.swift (1)
77-90: LGTM!The value method correctly handles the optional value property by providing a sensible default.
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer.swift (1)
16-76: Excellent documentation!The comprehensive documentation provides great context about the UIServer's architecture, features, and use cases. This will be very helpful for developers working with the code.
Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+ElementInfoRoutes.swift (6)
1-19: Well-structured class declaration and proper use of MainActor.The class is properly marked as
@MainActorandfinal, which ensures thread safety for UI operations and prevents inheritance. The documentation is clear and the dependency injection pattern is well implemented.
21-45: Comprehensive route registration with clear documentation.The route registration method properly registers all element info routes with appropriate handlers. The documentation clearly lists all available routes, making it easy for API consumers to understand the available endpoints.
47-65: Clean implementation of property getters.The identifier, title, label, and placeholderValue methods follow a consistent pattern and properly handle both required and optional return types.
67-107: Well-documented boolean property getters.The isSelected, hasFocus, and isEnabled methods include comprehensive documentation that clearly explains their purpose and usage context, which is helpful for API consumers.
109-135: Proper handling of complex types.The elementType method correctly returns the raw value for API serialization, and the frame method returns CGRect which should serialize properly with the API's JSON encoder.
166-173: Consistent integration with UIServer's modular architecture.The extension properly integrates ElementInfoRoutes into UIServer's route registration system, following the established pattern used by other route modules.
| private func tapElement(tapRequest: TapElementRequest) async throws -> Bool { | ||
| // Implementation would go here - currently missing from original file | ||
| let element = try cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId) | ||
| element.tap() | ||
| return true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incomplete tap implementation ignores request parameters.
The current implementation only performs a basic tap and ignores potential parameters like duration, numberOfTouches, and numberOfTaps that are likely present in TapElementRequest.
Based on the InteractionRoutes implementation, the method should handle:
private func tapElement(tapRequest: TapElementRequest) async throws -> Bool {
- // Implementation would go here - currently missing from original file
let element = try cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId)
- element.tap()
+
+ if let duration = tapRequest.duration {
+ element.press(forDuration: duration)
+ } else if let numberOfTouches = tapRequest.numberOfTouches {
+ let numberOfTaps = tapRequest.numberOfTaps ?? 1
+ element.tap(withNumberOfTaps: numberOfTaps, numberOfTouches: numberOfTouches)
+ } else {
+ element.tap()
+ }
+
return true
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private func tapElement(tapRequest: TapElementRequest) async throws -> Bool { | |
| // Implementation would go here - currently missing from original file | |
| let element = try cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId) | |
| element.tap() | |
| return true | |
| } | |
| private func tapElement(tapRequest: TapElementRequest) async throws -> Bool { | |
| let element = try cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId) | |
| if let duration = tapRequest.duration { | |
| element.press(forDuration: duration) | |
| } else if let numberOfTouches = tapRequest.numberOfTouches { | |
| let numberOfTaps = tapRequest.numberOfTaps ?? 1 | |
| element.tap(withNumberOfTaps: numberOfTaps, numberOfTouches: numberOfTouches) | |
| } else { | |
| element.tap() | |
| } | |
| return true | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift around lines 39 to 44, the tapElement
method currently performs a simple tap without considering parameters such as
duration, numberOfTouches, and numberOfTaps from the TapElementRequest. Update
the method to extract these parameters from tapRequest and use them to perform
the tap action accordingly, ensuring the tap behavior matches the request's
specifications.
| func registerRoutes() async { | ||
| // Note: This extension appears to be incomplete and may have duplicate functionality | ||
| // with InteractionRoutes. Consider consolidating or removing if not needed. | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Remove or complete the TapRoutes implementation.
The registerRoutes method is empty with a comment indicating incomplete/duplicate functionality. Based on the codebase analysis, InteractionRoutes already registers the tapElement and doubleTap routes. This class appears to be redundant.
Either:
- Remove this entire file if tap functionality is handled by
InteractionRoutes - Or complete the implementation and remove tap-related routes from
InteractionRoutesto avoid duplication
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if InteractionRoutes already handles tap routes
# Search for tap-related route registrations in InteractionRoutes
rg -A 5 'addRoute.*tap' Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift
# Check if TapRoutes is actually used anywhere
rg 'TapRoutes|registerTapRoutes' --type swiftLength of output: 1005
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Display the contents of TapRoutes file for review
sed -n '1,200p' Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swiftLength of output: 2684
Implement or remove the redundant TapRoutes.registerRoutes
The registerRoutes() method in Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift is empty and duplicates the tap routes already registered by InteractionRoutes, so no tap handlers are actually added when registerTapRoutes() is invoked. You should either:
- Remove the entire
UIServer+Tap.swiftfile (and itsregisterTapRoutes()call inUIServer) sincetapElement/doubleTapare handled by InteractionRoutes, or - Populate
registerRoutes()with the samerouteRegistrar.addRoute("tapElement", handler: tapElement(tapRequest:))andaddRoute("doubleTap", handler: doubleTap(tapRequest:))calls (and potentially other tap variants) and then remove those from InteractionRoutes to avoid overlap.
• File needing attention:
– Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift: lines 22–25 (func registerRoutes() async { … })
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+Tap.swift at lines 22 to 25, the
registerRoutes() method is empty and duplicates tap route registrations already
handled by InteractionRoutes, causing no tap handlers to be added when
registerTapRoutes() is called. To fix this, either remove the entire
UIServer+Tap.swift file and its registerTapRoutes() invocation in UIServer if
tap handling is fully covered by InteractionRoutes, or implement
registerRoutes() by adding the tap routes (e.g., addRoute("tapElement", handler:
tapElement(tapRequest:)) and addRoute("doubleTap", handler:
doubleTap(tapRequest:))) here and remove these from InteractionRoutes to avoid
duplication.
| func registerRoutes() async { | ||
| await routeRegistrar.addRoute("performAccessibilityAudit", handler: performAccessibilityAudit(request:)) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unused method or missing route registration.
The accessibilityTest method is defined but never registered as a route. Either register it or remove the unused code.
If the method is intended to be used, add the route registration:
func registerRoutes() async {
await routeRegistrar.addRoute("performAccessibilityAudit", handler: performAccessibilityAudit(request:))
+ await routeRegistrar.addRoute("accessibilityTest", handler: accessibilityTest(request:))
}Otherwise, remove the unused method (lines 72-80).
Also applies to: 72-80
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+AccessibilityRoutes.swift around lines 23 to 25
and 72 to 80, the accessibilityTest method is defined but not registered as a
route. To fix this, either add a route registration for accessibilityTest in the
registerRoutes function or remove the accessibilityTest method entirely if it is
unused.
| } else { | ||
| // Fallback on earlier versions | ||
| throw NSError(domain: "com.apple.XCTest", code: 0, userInfo: nil) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error message for iOS version requirement.
The error for iOS versions earlier than 17.0 should be more descriptive.
} else {
- // Fallback on earlier versions
- throw NSError(domain: "com.apple.XCTest", code: 0, userInfo: nil)
+ throw NSError(
+ domain: "UIUnitTest.AccessibilityRoutes",
+ code: 1,
+ userInfo: [NSLocalizedDescriptionKey: "Accessibility audit requires iOS 17.0 or later"]
+ )
}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+AccessibilityRoutes.swift around lines 57 to
60, the error thrown for iOS versions earlier than 17.0 is not descriptive.
Update the NSError to include a meaningful error message in the userInfo
dictionary explaining that the iOS version requirement is not met, so it is
clear why the error is thrown.
| guard let element = try? cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId) else { | ||
| return false | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling in tapElement method.
Using try? silently swallows errors, making debugging difficult. Consider propagating the error instead of returning false.
-guard let element = try? cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId) else {
- return false
-}
+let element = try cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| guard let element = try? cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId) else { | |
| return false | |
| } | |
| let element = try cache.getElement(tapRequest.serverId) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Server/ServerUITests/UIServer+InteractionRoutes.swift around lines 53 to 55,
the use of `try?` in the tapElement method silently swallows errors, which
hinders debugging. Replace `try?` with a proper `try` and propagate the error by
either throwing it from the method or handling it explicitly, instead of
returning false. This will ensure errors are not hidden and can be diagnosed
effectively.
…g agents 🤖 Generated with [opencode](https://opencode.ai) Co-Authored-By: opencode <[email protected]>
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Chores
Documentation