Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[1.3.999] sub-jurisdiction summary.csv not reporting inactive buckets #870

Open
yezr opened this issue Jul 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[1.3.999] sub-jurisdiction summary.csv not reporting inactive buckets #870

yezr opened this issue Jul 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@yezr
Copy link
Collaborator

yezr commented Jul 3, 2024

RCTab Version: 1.3.999
config: tab by batch and precinct some empty w repeat ranking.json
cvr: tab by batch test cvr empty precinct and batch w: repeat ranking.xlsx

What happened

Created a contest to test Tabulate By Batch. That CVR has A & B tying in the full contest and the following sub-jurisdictions

  • Precinct 1 // Batch x marked on the same records to confirm that precinct and batch output files should be effectively the same. A wins these first place votes by one
  • Unmarked Precinct // Batch empty precinct/batch columns to make sure that edge case is handled correctly. It creates missing_precinct_id and missing_batch_id summary files. B wins these first place votes by 1
image

It correctly splits vote totals across the candidates within the sub-jurisdiction summary files. However, there is a single vote (id=18) that is a C repeat ranking to test that inactive buckets are being correctly filled in sub-jurisdiction files. In the full contest summary.csv it is correctly transferred to the Inactive Ballot by Repeat Rankings bucket during the post-Round 1 transfer when C is eliminated.
image

However, the Inactive Ballots by Repeat Rankings bucket in both the precinct and batchsummary.csv files remains 0.
image

What I would Expect

In unmarked precinct and batch summary.csv's I would expect the inactive bucket (both for repeat ranking and the sum inactive bucket) for the post-Round 1 transfer to correctly capture the repeat ranking.

#265 and its PR #335 might be related?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant