You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Read Only Output files in 1.3.2 #748 needs confirmation that it sets correctly on mac & linux and see if there are any gotchas like the Windows user folder.
Programmatically verify Hart signed CVR files #747 will fail on all Hart Verity versions other than 3.2 in California. Also, is a little brittle since the cryptographic key can be changed at any time from within Verity but is hard coded in RCTab. How to proceed? Compiler flag to build a stricter CA version + more permissive general version? I want to avoid keeping hotfix/1.3.2 around. We have flexibility, but need to set expectations with Hart.
Targeting Windows user account folders for output path should fail config validation #757 is required, along w/ properly setting up permissions in the RCTab output folder detailed in Section 22 of the TDP, to ensure read-only outputs. This comes at the expense of ease of use for election admins. Need to confirm that is a price we are willing to pay. Exception text they will see if trying to save to My Documents, My Desktop or any other Windows User folders is
To ensure read-only access to RCTab output files, users must not set the output path to user account folders like Documents, Desktop, etc. -- any path under C:\users`theirWindowsAccountName` is prohibited. Please specify a new path outside this folder in the Output tab of the app (e.g. C:\RCTab\output).
#757 and #747 should be toggled OFF in 2.0. Should jurisdictions want those included we can create an UPDATE_PATH for them with these features toggled on.
@artoonie does that mean we are all good then? I think all the required stuff has been merged...
Given what's in this Issue, it seems like we are good. The few outstanding issues (bouncycastle, whether read-only works cross-platform as intended) have open issues and can be considered outside the scope of this Issue.
review all the 1.3.2 enhancements and see how they can go into 2.0
Need to review everything in here v1.3.1...v1.3.2
Should Be Included in 2.0
develop
Needs clarification from RCVRC
hotfix/1.3.2
around. We have flexibility, but need to set expectations with Hart.Needs clarification in devland
hotfix/1.3.2
. Trying to remember where exactly we landed on BouncyCastle...develop
, might need to back that out...hotfix/1.3.2
. Did it make it anywhere else?git branch -r --contains 0c9bd877ddb26b40b37d4db7e72f6011876f2776
says that commit doesn't existThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: