BAV unfinished MS descriptions

[thea-m]

In their own branches in various stages of completion

by @MarcinKrawczuk

• BAVborget2 merged some refs missing, to check in BauSen
• BAVborget3 merged, some refs missing
• BAVborget20
• BAVet129 merged
• BAVet130 merged many refs missing
• BAVet142 merged
• BAVet148 merged
• BAVet155 merged
• BAVet168 merged but many refs missing
• BAVet172 merged
• BAVet186 merged
• BAVet238 merged

Incipits and explicits of works of BAVet119 are written (commented out) in BAVet128

by @smaugustine - Lefafa sedq

• BAVet201
• BAVet202
• BAVet204
• BAVet206
• BAVet207
• BAVet209
• BAVet214
• BAVet215
• BAVet216
• BAVet217
• BAVet218

as well as

• BAVborget8
• BAVross865

[eu-genia]

Thank you, I suggest that I merge the stale branches, so that all changes, even if not complete, are on the master @MarcinKrawczuk is it OK?

[MarcinKrawczuk]

Yes, sure. It should be more or less OK, just incomplete. śr., 16 paź 2024 o 08:11 Eugenia ***@***.***> napisał(a):

…

Thank you, I suggest that I merge the stale branches, so that all changes, even if not complete, are on the master @MarcinKrawczuk <https://github.com/MarcinKrawczuk> is it OK? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2515 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO62KJT3LG7FZEX32Z62DTDZ3X7SNAVCNFSM6AAAAABQAVIV7SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIMJVHAYTONZUG4> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[eu-genia]

@thea-m I can see a branch called DR_23_08_BAVet161 but there seem to be no edits there?

[thea-m]

I don't remember it now, but I definitely have no uncommitted edits. Maybe I planned to work on it and never did. I think it can safely be deleted.

[eu-genia]

@smaugustine can you help us to keep uptodate with the BAV mss? there are some branches where you did some work, it would be good if they can be merged as far as possible, thank you! (I added them to the list above, please check if there is something I missed, too, thank you!)

[smaugustine]

As far as I can recall, they were fairly complete except for creating new person IDs 🤔.

[eu-genia]

Dear @smaugustine in this old branch BetaMasaheft/Manuscripts#2647 I see stubs for many manuscripts which have the same template copied, I am not sure that they are really complete. You do not need to complete them but it would be good to know which are the actual manuscripts described and which are just place holders to avoid double work. Thank you!