-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Baseline fitting and subtraction #8
Comments
Good thinking. We definitely need to incorporate baselining in our models. Not sure how this will look from a design perspective... Maybe need to sketch this out. |
For sure! Sounds like a good topic for next week. |
Let's make a Baseline class that can be used as a mix-in to the BaseSpectrum class. Then it can be a Boolean argument when initializing the BaseSpectrum. |
Stack overflow post about baseline fitting: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29156532/python-baseline-correction-library |
Nice! That last answer looks worth trying out.
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 1:38 PM Lucas Clayton Wheeler < ***@***.***> wrote:
Stack overflow post about baseline fitting:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29156532/python-baseline-correction-library
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHmJ9P82lbYociAnN4mrWJyU3dEY0xepks5txfbbgaJpZM4Tcfl5>
.
--
Jeremy Anderson
(Cell) 715-613-0274
|
👍 |
It occurred to me that we should add functions to ambigauss that will allow baseline fitting and subtraction. If someone is importing a raw spectrum dataset, having methods to handle baselines would make the package a lot more broadly useful. Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: