You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently having two stack size configs (originally implemented in #10) is a bit confusing. It also doesn't account for having consistent limits on items that stack to less than 64.
New solution: Change to a single option, 'Minimum Weight', bound between 1 and 1728 (27*64). This takes into account the relative stack weight instead (see the capacity bar code for reference).
Images
No response
Fabric Version
No response
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Request Description
Currently having two stack size configs (originally implemented in #10) is a bit confusing. It also doesn't account for having consistent limits on items that stack to less than 64.
New solution: Change to a single option, 'Minimum Weight', bound between 1 and 1728 (27*64). This takes into account the relative stack weight instead (see the capacity bar code for reference).
Images
No response
Fabric Version
No response
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: