vNet with multiple address spaces #117
-
Hello everyone! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
Hi @vladimirs-davidovs, thank you for reaching out to the community! You are not alone in this request, it has been brought up a number of times before in #94 and #116. The quick answer is that the current process doesn't work well today for Virtual Networks that are created (net-new) with multiple CIDR's. There is a work-around that I can suggest whilst we solve this issue in the product. You will see in #94, the current workflow they've used is as follows:
We fully acknowledge this is not ideal, and are working on a long-term fix. Hopefully this will help for now, but we'll update this discussion (and the attached issue/discussion) once we have something in our DEV branch for users to test and provide some feedback on. Hopefully we can have this done relatively soon (next week or two). Please let us know if you need anything else in the meantime! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @vladimirs-davidovs, in case you hadn't already seen my comments on other discussions & issues, you can now apply a comma-separated list of Reservation ID's on the X-IPAM-RES-ID Tag to cover multiple Address Spaces on a Virtual Network. You can also use Reservations for vWAN Hubs too. Hope this helps you out! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi @vladimirs-davidovs, thank you for reaching out to the community!
You are not alone in this request, it has been brought up a number of times before in #94 and #116. The quick answer is that the current process doesn't work well today for Virtual Networks that are created (net-new) with multiple CIDR's. There is a work-around that I can suggest whilst we solve this issue in the product.
You will see in #94, the current workflow they've used is as follows: