Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE REQ] Add dataSecurityMode to AzureDatabricksLinkedService #31908

Open
weidongxu-microsoft opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
Data Factory feature-request This issue requires a new behavior in the product in order be resolved. Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library. Service Attention Workflow: This issue is responsible by Azure service team.

Comments

@weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Member

API Spec link

https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/main/specification/datafactory/resource-manager/Microsoft.DataFactory/stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/LinkedService.json

API Spec version

2018-06-01

Please describe the feature.

User asks for dataSecurityMode feature in AzureDatabricksLinkedService.
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#43122 (comment)

Please let us know which property in current Swagger is for this dataSecurityMode feature. If none, please consider adding it to Swagger.

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft added feature-request This issue requires a new behavior in the product in order be resolved. Data Factory labels Dec 17, 2024
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft added the Service Attention Workflow: This issue is responsible by Azure service team. label Dec 17, 2024
@v-jiaodi v-jiaodi added the Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library. label Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Data Factory feature-request This issue requires a new behavior in the product in order be resolved. Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library. Service Attention Workflow: This issue is responsible by Azure service team.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants