Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenAPV #803

Open
youngkwonlim opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

OpenAPV #803

youngkwonlim opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
2-annual-review Annual Review for a Project or Working Group

Comments

@youngkwonlim
Copy link

Project description

OpenAPV will develop a royalty-free, open-source, open standard video codec for professional video capturing and post-production.

Sponsor from TAC

Samsung Electronics

Proposed Project Stage

Sandbox

Please explain how this project is aligned with the mission of the Academy Software Foundation?

Video codec is widely used by motion picture industry but it becomes a roadblock of various open source platform as there is no royalty-free open source, open standard video codec for professional video capturing and post-production.

What is the project’s license for code contributions and methodology for code contributions?

BSD 3-Clause

What tool or platform is utilized for source control (GitHub, etc.), and what is the location

(e.g., URL)?

https://github.com/cpncf/apv

What are the external dependencies of the project, and what are the licenses of those dependencies?

None

What roles does the project have (e.g., maintainers, committers?) Who are the current

core committers of the project, or which can a list of committers be found?

Several engineers from Samsung Electronics

What mailing lists are currently used by the project?

None

What tool or platform is leveraged by the project for issue tracking?

GitHub

Does the project have an OpenSSF Best Practices Badge? Do you foresee any

challenges in obtaining one?

It does not have currently. No challenges are identified.

What is the project’s website? Is there a wiki?

https://github.com/cpncf/apv-spec

What social media accounts are used by the project?

None

What is the project’s release methodology and cadence?

as needed.

Are any trademarks, registered or unregistered, leveraged by the project? Have any

trademark registrations been filed by the project or any third party anywhere in the world?

None

@lgritz
Copy link
Contributor

lgritz commented Aug 19, 2024

Very interesting!

Is it possible to use Apache-2.0 instead? It's the preferred default these days, and I think for video codecs in particular, the community would benefit from the greater level of certainty it provides regarding patents.

@youngkwonlim
Copy link
Author

Our current preference is BSD 3-Clause as proposed as it is the least restrictive one. However, we can certainly review that option as well.

@youngkwonlim
Copy link
Author

Please find the slides I have presented at the TAC meeting yesterday. Thank you again for the useful suggestions at the meeting. Please feel free to ask any further questions/comments.
OpenAPV proposal.pdf

@youngkwonlim
Copy link
Author

youngkwonlim commented Sep 9, 2024

If you are interested in reviewing the current status of open source project for APV, please feel free to check this repository, https://github.com/openapv/openapv

@reinecke
Copy link

Hi @youngkwonlim - do you happen to have data comparing APV to codecs like ProRes and HT J2K with metrics like:

  • PSNR scores
  • VMAF scores
  • encode/decode speed (ideally using both open source and commercial implementations for J2K)

I'd love to see a slate of these metrics to better understand where APV fits into the landscape.

@youngkwonlim
Copy link
Author

Hi Eric,

We can't directly compare APV with ProRes as we don't have license. But we have unofficial comparison result with a professional video codec implemented in ffmpeg in our presentation material. Please refer it as a preliminary result. We will discuss internally how much data we can provide.

@jmertic jmertic added 4-tac-meeting-short Short agenda item for the TAC meeting ( 5 minutes or less ) 2-annual-review Annual Review for a Project or Working Group and removed 1-new-project-wg New Project or Working Group application 4-tac-meeting-short Short agenda item for the TAC meeting ( 5 minutes or less ) labels Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2-annual-review Annual Review for a Project or Working Group
Projects
Status: Future Meeting Agenda Items
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants