Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cost of generative model not reducing, #7

Open
aashish-kumar opened this issue Mar 14, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Cost of generative model not reducing, #7

aashish-kumar opened this issue Mar 14, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@aashish-kumar
Copy link

The cost of discriminate model converges fast to low value and then no perceivable change to generative model. Can you please suggest what the issue might be.
this.mp4.tar.gz

@yuluntian
Copy link

I'm having the same issue.

@MalteFlender
Copy link

I too have this issue. A cheap workaround is to change the Data Distribution to self.mu = -2 or something like this.

@akanimax
Copy link

@MalteFlender How is that even a workaround let alone cheap? How can one change the original data distribution in any scenario? It's like saying my generator is not creating MNIST samples and is instead creating random noise, so I'd just drop MNIST dataset and instead say that my original dataset itself is noise and so my generator works! 😮
Btw, has anyone investigated the issue?

@akanimax
Copy link

akanimax commented Apr 27, 2018

@aashish-kumar , @yuluntian , @MalteFlender , if you guys are still interested, I found the same diagram as in @aashish-kumar 's video in this paper -> "MANY PATHS TO EQUILIBRIUM: GANS DO NOT NEED TO DECREASE A DIVERGENCE AT EVERY STEP" [see Fig 2. (page no. 5)]. I am currently reading this paper. You guys can check it out if interested.

@akanimax
Copy link

Wasserstein GAN is the solution to the problem ... https://www.alexirpan.com/2017/02/22/wasserstein-gan.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants