Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

missing llama3, ruby recommends to to add base64 to gemspec #5

Open
sowcow opened this issue Apr 27, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

missing llama3, ruby recommends to to add base64 to gemspec #5

sowcow opened this issue Apr 27, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@sowcow
Copy link

sowcow commented Apr 27, 2024

No description provided.

@AAlvAAro
Copy link
Owner

Hi @sowcow thank you for raising this issue, do you have a link where I can see the base64 recommendation to take a look? thanks in advance!

@sowcow
Copy link
Author

sowcow commented Apr 30, 2024

Hi @AAlvAAro, it is what ruby 3.3 warns about
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/12/25/ruby-3-3-0-released/

RubyGems and Bundler warn if users do require the following gems without adding them to Gemfile or gemspec. This is because they will become the bundled gems in the future version of Ruby.
This warning is suppressed if you use bootsnap gem. We recommend to run your application with DISABLE_BOOTSNAP=1 environment variable at least once. This is limitation of this version.
Targeted libraries are:
abbrev
base64
...

@AAlvAAro
Copy link
Owner

thanks @sowcow I'll address this soon

ErebusBat added a commit to signinsolutions/ruby-amazon-bedrock that referenced this issue May 15, 2024
ErebusBat added a commit to signinsolutions/ruby-amazon-bedrock that referenced this issue May 15, 2024
@ErebusBat
Copy link
Contributor

@sowcow I have resolved the merge conflicts and explicitly added the base64 gem to the gemspec to address #5.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants