Add pipefail, oneline example, shellcheck to README

[icetbr]

don't mean to !/bin/bash, but...

• !/bin/bash
  superset of sh, is a bit more programmer friendly, having associative arrays and support for pipefail
• !/bin/sh
  POSIX compatible, runs on more flavors of UNIX, not really a big deal nowadays
• !/usr/bin/env bash
  not needed, but fine see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16365130/what-is-the-difference-between-usr-bin-env-bash-and-usr-bin-bash

use the pipefail Luke!

• better error handling, see https://mobile.twitter.com/b0rk/status/1314345978963648524
  set -euo pipefail

kool kids do it in one line, add an example, THE ENDING ; is REQUIRED

deploy() { echo "I am ${FUNCNAME[0]}ing in one line!"; }

for the README

shellcheck yourself before you wreck yourself

a linter for bash scripts
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=timonwong.shellcheck

some nice tips

https://bertvv.github.io/cheat-sheets/Bash.html

a good Make write up

make has a nice auto detection of files changed, and will only build what has changed
https://spin.atomicobject.com/2021/03/22/makefiles-vs-package-json-scripts/

my 1cent

npm run start has a nagging delay of a few miliseconds, ./run.sh start does not, the article above shows an example

[icetbr]

Well, I made my own, thank you for the inspiration!

https://github.com/icetbr/run

[Vad1mo]

hey @icetbr sorry somehow your contribution went under my radar. :( This was not on purpose.

Would be happy to collaborate with you, if you are up for it can add you as a maintainer.

[icetbr]

Hello, thank you for your reply. I just gave do.sh a little touch up to suite my tastes, I expect everyone that uses it to do the same.

Does my version replace yours? Does do.sh user base find it better? I don't know. Maybe we wait other people input, and to to see if it gains more traction? Maybe just leave my comment here as a way to link both our projects?

I don't mean to take away the credit for "inventing" this idea by any means. I just want people to be aware of this.