diff --git a/content/blog/2025/binder-singlenode/featured.png b/content/blog/2025/binder-singlenode/featured.png
index 5f4074458..2599ca7c4 100644
Binary files a/content/blog/2025/binder-singlenode/featured.png and b/content/blog/2025/binder-singlenode/featured.png differ
diff --git a/content/blog/2025/binder-singlenode/index.md b/content/blog/2025/binder-singlenode/index.md
index 1853f282f..bd09d157e 100644
--- a/content/blog/2025/binder-singlenode/index.md
+++ b/content/blog/2025/binder-singlenode/index.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 title: "2i2c joins the mybinder.org federation with a cheaper and faster way to deploy Binderhub"
-date: "2025-01-28"
+date: "2025-01-29"
 authors: ["Yuvi Panda", "Chris Holdgraf"]
 tags: [open source]
 categories: [impact]
@@ -48,29 +48,14 @@ Because of these two things, we've learned that we can run a BinderHub instance
 
 Last week, we [deployed 2i2c.mybinder.org](https://github.com/jupyterhub/mybinder.org-deploy/pull/3169), a single-node Kubernetes instance on [Hetzner](https://hetzner.com/cloud) cloud using [K3s](https://k3s.io/). This will run on a single node VM, with a Kubernetes instance that is entirely managed by us, and with managed object storage from Hetzner. Compared to other cloud providers, it is **around 5x cheaper per month**.
 
-{{< figure src="featured.png" caption="Comparison of rough monthly costs across different cloud providers for similar VM instances. These are rough estimates based on cloud provider pricing pages for an on-demand VM with around 190GB RAM. Pricing pages: [Hetzner Cloud](https://www.hetzner.com/cloud), [Google Cloud Platform](https://cloud.google.com/compute/vm-instance-pricing), [Amazon Web Services](https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/on-demand/), [Microsoft Azure](https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/virtual-machines/linux/#pricing)." >}}
-
-<!-- Data for the figure above: 
-
-  Hetzner
-    https://www.hetzner.com/cloud
-    CCX63
-    $320/mo
-  Amazon Web Services
-    https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/on-demand/
-    https://calculator.aws/#/createCalculator/ec2-enhancement
-    m8g.12xlarge
-    $1500
-  Google Cloud Platform
-    https://cloud.google.com/products/calculator?hl=en&dl=CjhDaVEzWlRkbU1tVTNaaTFtTWpJNExUUmxObVV0T0dFME5TMHlObVJrTmpsall6RmtPR0VRQVE9PRAIGiRGRjUzNTJEQi1EODI4LTQ0RTYtOEM3MC0wMkNFNUZDQ0RGOUQ
-    n2-standard-48
-    $1700
-  Microsoft Azure
-    https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/virtual-machines/linux/#pricing
-    https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/calculator/
-    D48ads v5
-    $1,800
+{{< figure src="featured.png" caption="Comparison of rough monthly costs across different cloud providers for similar VM instances. These are rough estimates based on cloud provider pricing pages for an on-demand VM with around 190GB RAM. Pricing pages: [Hetzner Cloud](https://www.hetzner.com/cloud) ~$300, [Microsoft Azure](https://azure.com/e/da6294b08dfa49639f74caad1630bbe4) ~$1,300, [Google Cloud Platform](https://cloud.google.com/products/calculator?hl=en&dl=CjhDaVJrWlRBeVpEUmpNQzAwTVRrMkxUUmtNalV0T0RnNU5pMHpaV1EyWlRnMFpHSXpPVE1RQVE9PRAIGiRDRTQ3QTYwQy1DNUM5LTQ3QkQtQTM3MS05MjBCQjU1QjNGRjg) ~$1,500, [Amazon Web Services](https://calculator.aws/#/estimate?id=a3bddb8bdbfa2058b941b669e408141e7fd18da4) ~$1,600." >}}
 
+<!-- Machines for the figure above: 
+
+  Hetzner: CCX63
+  Amazon Web Services: m8g.12xlarge
+  Google Cloud Platform: n2-standard-48
+  Microsoft Azure: D48as v5
 -->
 
 Running a single-node Kubernetes instance will be a cheap and effective way to handle a lot of `mybinder.org`'s capacity needs. Because it's a single node cluster, there is no auto-scaling (one reason it is so cheap), which reduces a lot of the complexity we'll have to manage. These are acceptable tradeoffs for a service like `mybinder.org`, which runs entirely ephemeral sessions with very limited resources and no promises about uptime, persistence, etc.