Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom Flag to support Block deprecations #72

Open
1 task done
dsawardekar opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

Custom Flag to support Block deprecations #72

dsawardekar opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed type:enhancement New feature or request.

Comments

@dsawardekar
Copy link
Collaborator

Is your enhancement related to a problem? Please describe.

The current WP CLI based bulk migration feature can also be used to assist with Block migrations. When you implement Block migrations you need to reopen and save the Post for the migration to persist to the database.

We could implement a custom flag like --always-save to ensure that even posts that do not have CE content are resaved by the plugin during bulk migration.

Designs

NA

Describe alternatives you've considered

NA

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@dsawardekar dsawardekar added the type:enhancement New feature or request. label Jul 12, 2022
@vikrampm1 vikrampm1 moved this to Incoming in Open Source Practice Jul 12, 2022
@jeffpaul jeffpaul moved this from Incoming to Backlog in Open Source Practice Jul 12, 2022
@jeffpaul jeffpaul added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jul 12, 2022
@jeffpaul jeffpaul added this to the Future Release milestone Jul 12, 2022
@jeffpaul jeffpaul moved this from Incoming to Backlog in Open Source Practice Aug 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed type:enhancement New feature or request.
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants