Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Single Circuit Representation for Plonky2 and Starky #1219

Open
jakzale opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Single Circuit Representation for Plonky2 and Starky #1219

jakzale opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jakzale

Comments

@jakzale
Copy link
Contributor

jakzale commented Feb 12, 2024 •
edited
Loading

We need to write circuits using two different APIs:

  • plonky2, and
  • starky

Those APIs are very similar and we currently need to ensure that the circuits match by hand.

See

Relevant Slack discussions:
@jakzale jakzale self-assigned this Feb 12, 2024
@matthiasgoergens
Copy link
Collaborator

See #1211 for the beginnings of a sketch of how that might look like.

@matthiasgoergens matthiasgoergens linked a pull request Feb 13, 2024 that will close this issue
Unify basic and recursive constraints (WIP) #1211
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jakzale jakzale

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Unify basic and recursive constraints (WIP) 0xmozak/mozak-vm
2 participants
@matthiasgoergens @jakzale